Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

South Carolina · Public charity

American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs

To encourage the highest standards of excellence in developing and applying knowledge of chemistry and chemical engineering to the products and processes of industry, To promote the development of chemical science and technology in academics and industry, To improve qualifications and usefulness of chemists and engineers though high…

$15k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$9k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$8,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$8,500
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$501k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Chemical Society$8,5001n/a

Compare American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs with peer funders

About American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs

How much does American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs give?
American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs reported 1 itemized grants totaling $8,500, out of $15,035 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Science & Tech (100%).
Who are American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: American Chemical Society ($9k).
Where is American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs based?
American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Chemical Society Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry of the Acs’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home