Skip to content
American Board of Obgyn Educational Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

American Board of Obgyn Educational Foundation Inc

To organize educational opportunities including scholarships and seminars relating to the obgyn field of medicine for both existing doctors and students.

$476k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$290k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$4.5MArts & Culture$425kEducation$210kCivil Rights$5kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AAOG FOUNDATION$290,000
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$100,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR SMFM$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%THE FOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMENS HEALTH INC: $559k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 21%CDC FOUNDATION: $750k → 13%SOCIETY FOR ACADEMIC SPECIALISTS IN GENERAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY: $125k → 8%AMERICAN GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRICAL SOCIETY: $14k → 14%IMPACT PEOPLE AGAINST CHILD TRAFFICKING IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS: $5k → 7%AAOG FOUNDATION: $365k → 7%THE FOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMENS HEALTH INC: $550k → 14%THE FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 21%AMERICAN BOARD OF MEDICAL SPECIALTIES RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AAOG FOUNDATION: $295k → 7%THE FOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMENS HEALTH INC: $103k → 14%THE FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%AAOG FOUNDATION: $295k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%AAOG FOUNDATION: $295k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%AAOG FOUNDATION: $290k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $85k → 14%AAOG FOUNDATION: $290k → 7%SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE: $10k → 14%SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE: $10k → 14%SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $10k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 6 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthEducationArts & CultureScience & TechCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.8M · revenue +137% · 51% of their budget
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR SMFM
    6× · 2017–2022 · $510k · revenue +48%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $750k · revenue +102%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR ACADEMIC SPECIALISTS IN GENERAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +33% · 40% of their budget
  • CO
    CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Urogynecologic Society

To promote the highest quality care in urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery through excellence in education, research and advocacy.

Health
2
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
3
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…

Education
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Improve health care and population health by assessing and enhancing the quality of resident and fellow physicians' education through advancements in accreditation and education.

Education
6
Society of General Internal Medicine

To cultivate innovative educators, researchers, and clinicians in academic general internal medicine, leading the way to better healthcare for everyone.

Health
7
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
8
The Administrators in Medicine Foundation
Health
9
American Society for Clinical Pathology

The mission of the american society for clinical pathology is to provide excellence in education, certification and advocacy on behalf of patients, pathologists and medical laboratory professionals.

—
10
The American Board of Internal Medicine

See schedule o.the american board of internal medicine (abim) seeks to enhance the quality of health care by certifying internists and subspecialists who demonstrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes essential for excellent patient care.

Health
11
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
12
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology; the most unlike its peers is Impact People Against Child Trafficking in American Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,830,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS FOUNDATION INCFOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMEN'S HEALTH INC: $1,212,065 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMEN'S HEALTH INCCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $325,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI+2 more: $114,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $750,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDAT…FOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $510,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR …WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIV…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationSOCIETY FOR ACADEMIC SPECIALISTS IN GENERAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY: $125,000 · HealthSOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN BOARD OF MEDICAL SPECIALTIES RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $5,000 · Science & TechIMPACT PEOPLE AGAINST CHILD TRAFFICKING IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$3,481,065Arts & Culture$750,000Education$720,000Health$165,000Science & Tech$5,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,830,000 over 6y, 51% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EXXCELLENCE IN WOMEN'S HEALTH INC: $1,212,065 over 3y, 59% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $750,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SMFM: $510,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR ACADEMIC SPECIALISTS IN GENERAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY: $125,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetSOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Gynecological and Obstetrical Society: $14,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICAN BOARD OF MEDICAL SPECIALTIES RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Board of Obgyn Educational Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Board of Obgyn Educational Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Board of Obgyn Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home