Skip to content

· Public charity

American Association of Tissue Banks Inc

The mission of the Association is to honor donors and to save and improve lives by promoting the safety, quality and availability of donated tissue for transplantation, and non-transplant anatomical material for education and research.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$627kScience & Tech$25k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,113
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Clemson University$25,113
Donate Life America$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONELEGACY: $10k → 14%TISSUE TESTING TECHNOLOGIES LLC: $35k → 12%TRANSPLANT GAMES OF AMERICA: $25k → 11%ASSOCIATION FOR MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS IN TRANSPLANTATION: $10k → 7%Donate Life America: $20k → 9%LIFENET HEALTH: $50k → 10%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $46k → 22%NEVADA DONOR NETWORK: $10k → 13%DONATE LIFE ROSE PARADE FLOAT: $10k → 14%TISSUE TESTING TECHNOLOGIES: $25k → 12%LIFENET HEALTH: $23k → 10%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $41k → 22%LIFENET HEALTH: $20k → 10%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $40k → 22%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $40k → 22%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $31k → 22%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $30k → 22%DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $21k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 4 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$443k
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+34%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DL
    DONATE LIFE AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $269k · revenue +48%
  • LH
    LIFENET HEALTH
    3× · 2018–2020 · $93k · revenue +43%
  • O
    ONELEGACY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS
    one grant, 2021 · $93k
  • CT
    Creative Testing Solutionsgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $47k · revenue +34%
  • TL
    TRANSPLANT LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Donor Network of Arizona

To make the most of life through the gift of organ and tissue donation and to challange ourselves and others everyday to realize arizona's potential to save and improve lives.

Health
2
Donate Life California

Donate Life Californa is a nonprofit organ and tissue donor registry dedicated to saving the lives of thousands of Californians awaiting life-saving transplants. The registry is used by the states organ and tissue recovery organizations.

Health
3
Donor Network West

Donor network west is the federally designated organ procurement organization serving northern california and northern nevada. the service area includes nearly 14 million people across 100,000 square miles. approximately 110,000 people are…

—
4
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
5
Organ Donation & Transplantation Alliance

Our mission: the alliance unites the organ donation, transplantation and healthcare communities to promote collaboration, cascade innovations and share effective practices for the benefit of restoring lives through transplantation.our…

Education
6
Upper Midwest Organ Procurement Organization Inc

We partner with communities, families and healthcare professionals to save and heal lives through advocacy and excellence in organ, eye and tissue donation.

Health
7
Lifelink Foundation Inc

To honor donors and save lives through organ and tissue donation. (expanded mission on schedule o)

Health
8
Mid-America Transplant Services

To save lives through excellence in organ and tissue donation.

Health
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
Indiana Organ Procurement Organization Inc

In 2024, indiana organ procurement organization d.b.a indiana network facilitated 1388 organ transplants from 509 organ donors leading to 1,216 lives saved. additionally, 1,669 tissue and cornea donors gave the gift of healing and sight,…

Health
11
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
12
Lifegift Organ Donation Center

The mission of lifegift is to provide community benefit by ethically, effectively and efficiently recovering appropriately transplantable organs and tissue to give the gift of life. lifegift also provides public and professional education…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donate Life America; the most unlike its peers is Association for Multcultural Affairs in Transplantation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONATE LIFE AMERICA: $269,300 · OtherDONATE LIFE AMERICAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS: $92,602 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVISTISSUE TESTING TECHNOLOGIES LLC: $60,000 · OtherTISSUE TESTING TECHNOLOGIES LLCCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $25,113 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYLIFENET HEALTH: $93,344 · HealthLIFENET HEALTHTRANSPLANT LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTRANSPLANT LIFE FOUNDATIONONELEGACY: $20,000 · HealthONELEGACYNEVADA DONOR NETWORK INC: $10,000 · HealthNEVADA DONOR NETWORK INCAssociation for Multcultural Affairs in Transplantation: $10,000 · HealthAssociation for Multcultura…Creative Testing Solutions: $46,570 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$447,015Health$158,344Public Safety & Disaster$46,570

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $269,300 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetLIFENET HEALTH: $93,344 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Testing Solutions: $46,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSPLANT LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetONELEGACY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA DONOR NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Association of Tissue Banks Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Association of Tissue Banks Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Association of Tissue Banks’ filings →

    More from the funding graph