Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Maryland · Public charity

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

We create a safer, healthier world.

$31k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$31,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$31,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$23M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations American Association for Laboratory Accreditation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$31k0%
FY20211$1.2Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Employment$1.2M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
A2la Workplace Training$1,200,377240%

Compare American Association for Laboratory Accreditation with peer funders

About American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

How much does American Association for Laboratory Accreditation give?
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation reported 1 grants totaling $31,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does American Association for Laboratory Accreditation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Employment (100%).
Who are American Association for Laboratory Accreditation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: A2la Workplace Training ($1.2M).
Does American Association for Laboratory Accreditation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is American Association for Laboratory Accreditation based?
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Association for Laboratory Accreditation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home