Skip to content

· Public charity

American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine

Empowering and supporting a collaborative multidisciplinary community that provides accessible and robust scientific education for health professionals and researchers, fosters innovative research as well as its dissemination and implementation, and advocates for equitable access to evidence based and patient centered care.

$76k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Science & Tech$341kHealth$270k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALREAD I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%GILLETTE CHILDREN'S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $25k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25k → 14%NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $15k → 16%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $15k → 20%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 19%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $25k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 21%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $25k → 8%NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LUNE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $25k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
DE
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 4 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$206k
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+35%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +75%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +34%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    2× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +33%
  • BO
    BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
4
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
5
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Boston Children's Network Specialty Physicians Inc

BCNSP supports the following three pillars of Boston Children's Hospital's four-part mission: (1) providing care to individuals in the community, (2) improving clinical care to its patients, and (3) educating and training clinicians. In…

Health
11
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
12
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $35,743 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $25,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKATRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIATRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $24,984 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $24,976 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATIONRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $25,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of ChicagoAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $25,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of C…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare: $25,000 · HealthGillette Children's Specialty HealthcareSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $24,710 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALChildren's Hospital Corporation: $20,508 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationYale University: $50,000 · EducationYale Univ…Northwestern University: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwest…
Other$265,703Health$245,218Education$50,000Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $24,710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $20,508 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine?

Find your warmest path to American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $86k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine’s filings →

More from the funding graph