Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Amber Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Crime & Legal$20kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kPublic Benefit$5kEducation$3kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
TURNING POINT USA$500
CATO INSTITUTE$500
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
THE SALVATION ARMY$300
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$300
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MI$250
MI PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION$225
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$45k
$3k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +91%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +53%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Atlantic Legal Foundation

The mission of the alf is to advance the rule of law by advocating limited and efficient government, free enterprise, individual liberty, property rights, effective education, and the use of sound science in judicial and regulatory…

5
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Rodel Institute

The rodel institute is a nonpartisan center for leadership and intellectual growth. rodel helps america's most promising leaders reach their full potential as public servants, deepen their commitment to democracy and the rule of law,…

Philanthropy
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Legal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENS — $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL…NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK FOUND…TURNING POINT USA INC — $2,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCSALVATION ARMY — $1,550 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MI — $750 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $11,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF D…PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,300 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDA…Pacific Legal Foundation — $11,500 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal Founda…American Heart Association Inc — $6,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Asso…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOC…MICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,275 · HealthMICHIGAN PSYCHOANAL…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,500 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,000 · EducationCATO INSTITUTE — $2,400 · Public Benefit
Other$15,800Philanthropy$12,300Crime & Legal$11,500Health$10,775Human Services$6,500Education$3,000Public Benefit$2,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,275 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Amber Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Amber Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Amber Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph