Skip to content

· Private foundation

Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2023
40
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 23 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund named its own grantees at scale: 35 organizations, $118k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

26
’20
23
’21
19
’22
35
’23
23
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$316kPhilanthropy$147kHuman Services$56kHealth$43kEducation$29kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k38 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$1,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH$8,000
IMAGINE FOUNDATION INC$8,000
CONGREGATION AND YESHIVA BETH HILLEL$7,700
CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL$7,102
SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL$7,091
THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH TORAH$4,213
YESHIVAT HECHAL SHEMUEL INC$3,600
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL$3,032
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPERION SHLOMO LTORAH VCHESED INC$3,000
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC$2,600
NEW YORK CANCER CENTER$2,600
AVENUE R SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $10k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $5k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE: $2k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Altoon Sutton Memorial Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 44 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
37

Total granted

$414k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +88%
  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SO
    SYNAGOGUE OF NEW JERSEY
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
8
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ezra Cornman Bar Mitzvah Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH TORAH: $37,467 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH TORAHIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL: $23,528 · OtherCONG MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEALMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $22,501 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHEDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE: $21,813 · OtherEDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUESYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $20,003 · OtherHILLEL YESHIVA: $16,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherAVENUE R SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION: $14,000 · Other+72 more: $175,392 · Other+72 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $141,963 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+4 more: $8,400 · Philanthropy+4 moreYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $18,000 · EducationIMAGINE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $4,206 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $3,600 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $2,000 · EducationREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $1,800 · Education+4 more: $2,680 · EducationTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $26,800 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $9,820 · Human ServicesRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $1,600 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $18,000 · ReligionSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $7,200 · ReligionSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $3,000 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $1,800 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,200 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 · HealthDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $3,003 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$395,604Philanthropy$150,363Education$40,286Human Services$38,720Religion$31,000Health$8,200Youth Development$6,003

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $141,963 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $26,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $9,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetShoresh Inc: $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $4,301 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $4,206 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $3,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $3,003 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPERION SHLOMO LTORAH VCHESED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL NACHLAS: $2,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORA VESIMCHA: $1,440 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON MAYIR: $1,180 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mikdash Shaul I: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $520 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Shoresh Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Porat Yoseph Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY88.6× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · E R G Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Altoon Sutton Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph