Skip to content
Alpha Tau Omega Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Alpha Tau Omega Foundation Inc

To promote academic, character, values and leadership development through grants, scholarships, and educational programs.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$432k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.4MMembership Benefit$1.2MEducation$561kArts & Culture$471kPublic Safety & Disaster$8k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,312,660, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,615,390 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $302,730 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $436k
  • $250k+2 grants · $850k
$240,931
Median grant
4
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY$432,343
EPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION$417,597
RPG MANAGEMENT LLC$240,931
IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA$195,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$13,833
ALPHA DELTA FOUNDATION$12,956
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OTIS ALLAN GLAZEBROOK MEMORIAL: $42k → 9%OTIS ALLEN GLAZEBROOK MEMORIAL STUDENTS AID FUND: $285k → 10%DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION: $60k → 16%EPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION: $515k → 19%EVERFI INC: $23k → 14%IOWA GAMMA UPSILON: $90k → 17%ALPHA TAU OMEGA BUILDING CORP: $25k → 20%UNC CASHIER: $34k → 13%BETA IOTA HOUSING CORPORATION: $40k → 13%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $432k → 16%IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $523k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 19%ALPHA TAU OMEGA CORPORATION: $703k → 12%PLAID LLC: $8k → 15%OTIS ALLAN GLAZEBROOK MEMORIAL: $20k → 9%DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORP: $45k → 16%EPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION: $418k → 19%EVERFI INC: $23k → 14%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $385k → 16%IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $247k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 19%ALPHA TAU OMEGA CORPORATION: $119k → 12%DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION: $45k → 16%EVERFI INC: $23k → 14%RICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP: $379k → 16%IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $210k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $13k → 19%ALPHA TAU OMEGA CORPORATION: $90k → 12%DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION: $30k → 16%EVERFI INC: $23k → 14%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $279k → 16%IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $195k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $13k → 19%DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORP: $20k → 16%RPG MANAGEMENT LLC: $241k → 16%IGG OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY: $13k → 19%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $142k → 16%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $128k → 16%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $98k → 16%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $91k → 16%ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $75k → 16%RICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP: $52k → 16%RICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP: $24k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
IL
IA
IN
KY
KS
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 10 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$6.4M
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-34%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +32%
  • AT
    ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER ROSE HULMAN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +101% · 67% of their budget
  • EO
    EPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $933k · revenue +118% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • GU
    GAMMA UPSILON CHAPTER OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA
    one grant, 2018 · $90k · revenue +22% · 25% of their budget
  • AT
    ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue -34%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alpha Omicron of Chi Psi Corporation

To provide fraternity housing for college students.

—
2
Phi Kappa Psi - Oregon Alpha Chapter S&T Fraternity Management

Housing for college fraternity

—
3
Alpha Pi Building Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
4
Georgia Tech Chapter of Delta Chi Fraternity Housing Corporation

Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.

—
5
Alpha Alpha Delta of Chi Psi Lodge Assoc Inc

To own and maintain a housing facility for chi psi fraternity members at the university of georgia.

Education
6
Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity Epsilon Chi Chapter

Alpha Gamma Delta is an international womens fraternity that promotes academic excellence philanthropic giving ongoing leadership and personal development and above all a spirit of loving sisterhood.

—
7
Delta Tau Delta Association of Columbia Mo

A house corporation that owns the delta tau delta fraternity house at the the university of missouri - columbia. the mission is to provide housing for the gamma kappa chapter of the delta tau delta fraternity.

—
8
Gamma Iota House Corporation

Provide for our members a safe, quality living environment that promotes academic excellence and individual and chapter success. We are committed to fiscal responsibility, operating with integrity , honoring tradition and demonstrating…

—
9
Gamma Iota Chapter of Alpha Delta Pi House Corporation

To provide housing, meals, and a meeting place for social activities of college age women, members of gamma iota chapter of alpha delta pi sorority.

Education
10
Alpha Psi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
11
Alpha Kappa of Alpha Chi Omega Alumni Holding Association

Collegiate sorority housing

—
12
Gamma Tau Chapter Housing Corp

Lease real estate to gamma tau chapter of kappa alpha order

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alpha Tau Omega Building Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Epsilon Omicron Holding Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY INC: $1,629,571 · OtherALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY INCALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $911,854 · OtherALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITYRICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP LTD: $696,031 · OtherRICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP LTDOTIS ALLAN GLAZEBROOK MEMORIAL STUDENTS AID FUND: $347,207 · OtherOTIS ALLAN GLAZEBROOK MEMORIAL STUDENTS AID FUNDATO DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION: $200,000 · Other+8 more: $366,878 · Other+8 moreALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER ROSE HULMAN: $1,180,497 · EducationALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNIT…ALPHA DELTA FOUNDATION: $318,321 · EducationALPHA DELTA FOUNDATIONEPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION: $933,029 · Community ImprovementEPSILON OMICRON …
Other$4,151,541Education$1,498,818Community Improvement$933,029

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY INC: $1,629,571 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER ROSE HULMAN: $1,180,497 over 5y, 67% of budgetEPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION: $933,029 over 2y, 38% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $911,854 over 3y, 81% of budgetRICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP LTD: $696,031 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetALPHA DELTA FOUNDATION: $318,321 over 3y, 41% of budgetATO DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION: $200,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetGAMMA UPSILON CHAPTER OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA: $90,036 over 1y, 25% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY: $40,091 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA BUILDING CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER ROSE HULMAN ↗
  • Who funds EPSILON OMICRON HOLDING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND PROPERTY GROUP LTD ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA DELTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ATO DELTA KAPPA HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GAMMA UPSILON CHAPTER OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA BUILDING CORPORATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alpha Tau Omega Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alpha Tau Omega Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alpha Tau Omega’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home