Skip to content
Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity

The organization was established to perpetuate among a group of college women a spirit of mutual assistance and understanding to maintain high standards of scholarship, to develop womanhood, to strive for the attainment of high ideals in college, community and personal life, and to train for leadership and a sense of responsibility for…

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$775kEducation$450kMembership Benefit$64kHuman Services$32k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $93,230, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,388 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,158 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $87k
$36,580
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPSILON CHI CHAPTER OF ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY$40,350
XI CHAPTER OF ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY$36,580
NATIONAL PANHELLENIC CONFERENCE INC$10,000
GAMMA NU CHAPTER OF ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY$6,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRATERNITY AND SORORITY ACTION FUND: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
IN
NE
VA
AZ
KS
TN
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $450k · revenue +79%
  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY HOUSE CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $336k · revenue +5%
  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY EPSILON CHI CHAPTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $223k · revenue +18% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • AS
    ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $111k
  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY RHO CHAPTER
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue +9%
  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY BETA ALPHA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue 0% · 80% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delta Sigma Chapter of Alpha Delta Pi House Corporation

Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of a national collegiate social sorority.

Education
2
Gamma Iota Chapter of Alpha Delta Pi House Corporation

To provide housing, meals, and a meeting place for social activities of college age women, members of gamma iota chapter of alpha delta pi sorority.

Education
3
Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity

College fraternity providing leadership, social and schlorshipenvironment along with board and lodging for its members who areengaged in social service projects throughout the year. the membersare undergraduate students at the georgia…

Education
4
Alpha Phi International Fraternity- Theta Chapter

Alpha Phi is a sisterhood of women supporting each other in lifelong achievement.

—
5
Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity

The organization was established to perpetuate among a group of college women a spirit of mutual assistance and understanding to maintain high standards of scholarship, to develop womanhood, to strive for the attainment of high ideals in…

Education
6
Alpha Phi International Fraternity- Beta Tau Chapter

Alpha Phi is a sisterhood of women supporting each other in lifelong achievement.

—
7
Delta Kappa Epsilon

Delta kappa epsilon strives to develop a culture and an expectation of undergraduate chapters who perform in the top tier of fraternities at their institutions, and a vibrant network of alumni who are motivated to stay involved with the…

—
8
Epsilon Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity

Through the real. strong. women. experience, alpha chi omega cultivates impactful communities where women are inspired to connect, lead, grow and serve.

—
9
Gamma Rho Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc

Through the real. strong. women. experience, alpha chi omega cultivates impactful communities where women are inspired to connect, lead, grow and serve.

—
10
Phi Delta Sigma Inc

Provide a residential facility for undergraduates to live, study, and participate in social activities and athletic events. the members also participate in volunteer activities to support the community. the organization provides a place…

—
11
Sigma Delta Tau - Gamma Lambda Chapter

To provide room, board and fellowship to members of college sorority.

—
12
Alpha Phi International Fraternity Epsilon Chi Chapter

Alpha Phi is a sisterhood of women supporting each other in lifelong achievement.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity Rho Chapter; the most unlike its peers is Fraternity and Sorority Action Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 · EducationALPHA GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATION INCALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY HOUSE CORPORATION: $336,315 · EducationALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY HOUSE CORPORATIONALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY EPSILON CHI CHAPTER: $222,625 · OtherALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY EPSILON CHI CH…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $110,834 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY XI CHAPTER: $59,580 · OtherALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY XI CHAPTERALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY RHO CHAPTER: $35,000 · OtherALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY RHO CHAPTERALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY BETA ALPHA CHAPTER: $32,780 · OtherALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY BETA ALPHA CHA…ALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY THETA OMEGA CHAPTER: $25,063 · Other+3 more: $23,720 · OtherFRATERNITY AND SORORITY ACTION FUND: $25,000 · Human Services
Education$786,315Other$509,602Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY HOUSE CORPORATION: $336,315 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY EPSILON CHI CHAPTER: $222,625 over 3y, 40% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY XI CHAPTER: $59,580 over 2y, 10% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY RHO CHAPTER: $35,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY BETA ALPHA CHAPTER: $32,780 over 1y, 80% of budgetALPHA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY THETA OMEGA CHAPTER: $25,063 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRATERNITY AND SORORITY ACTION FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL PANHELLENIC CONFERENCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity?

    Find your warmest path to Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alpha Gamma Delta Fraternity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home