Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Allegheny Land Trust

We conserve and care for local land for the health and well-being of current and future generations.

$40k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$40,150
Largest grant, FY2020
$40,150
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2019 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$35M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations Allegheny Land Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20201$40k0%
FY20192$85kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$90kFood & Nutrition$35k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Montour Trail Council$90,15025%
Grow Pittsburgh$35,34613%

Compare Allegheny Land Trust with peer funders

About Allegheny Land Trust

How much does Allegheny Land Trust give?
Allegheny Land Trust reported 1 grants totaling $40,150 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2020.
What does Allegheny Land Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2020, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (72%), Food & Nutrition (28%).
Who are Allegheny Land Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2020: Montour Trail Council ($90k), Grow Pittsburgh ($35k).
Does Allegheny Land Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Allegheny Land Trust based?
Allegheny Land Trust is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.6M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allegheny Land’s filings →

More from the funding graph