Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alice W Miles Tuw-Worc Hs

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$83kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$350k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$1,800
BENTLEY UNIVERSITY$1,800
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$1,800
BOSTON COLLEGE$1,800
WESTFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOSTON COLLEGE: $2k → 7%UMASS-LOWELL: $2k → 8%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $4k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%WESTFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%PENN STATE BRANDYWINE: $2k → 10%SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $2k → 7%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT: $3k → 9%RUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $2k → 8%UMASS-LOWELL: $2k → 8%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $3k → 12%SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $2k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $2k → 12%WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 16%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%MASS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $2k → 16%BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INST: $2k → 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$40k · 6 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$40k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +38%
  • AU
    ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +9%
  • BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +53%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UMASS AMHERST — $9,234 · OtherUMASS AMHERSTWORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY — $8,825 · OtherWORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITYWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE — $6,833 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTEUMASS-LOWELL — $4,400 · OtherUMASS-LOWELLUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT — $2,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORTYALE UNIVERSITY — $2,700 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYRUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ — $2,400 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,334 · OtherFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,333 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · OtherMASS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY — $2,000 · OtherWESTFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,800 · OtherASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $6,433 · EducationASSUMPTION UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $4,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · EducationBENTLEY UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $3,025 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $2,400 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $2,400 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSSSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $2,400 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $2,333 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGEWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $2,100 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $2,100 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $2,100 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $1,800 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $1,800 · Education+2 more — $2,050 · Education
Other$47,559Education$39,941

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE — $6,833 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $6,433 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $3,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $2,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alice W Miles Tuw-Worc Hs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 6% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 2% of income from government
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
  • Assumption University — 1% of income from government
  • Simmons University — 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
  • Bentley University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home