Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice Turner Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Animals$450kRecreation & Sports$50kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Woman's Animal Center$30,000
Best Friends Animal Society - att Carragh Maloney$30,000
Our Companion Animal Rescue$30,000
Wildlife Wildlife Freedom Foundation Inc$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Helping Hands Monkey Helpers: $15k → 16%Woman's Animal Center: $30k → 6%HOPE -- Wilton Mall: $40k → 7%Broome Animal Sanctuary: $20k → 10%Panthera Corp: $5k → 17%World Wildlife Fund: $10k → 14%Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: $30k → 9%The Jane Goodall Institute: $5k → 6%Alley Cat Allies: $15k → 8%Helping Hands Monkey Helpers: $5k → 16%Woman's Animal Center: $10k → 6%Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation: $30k → 7%Pathera Corp: $5k → 17%World Wildlife Fund: $10k → 14%Best Friends Animal Society - att Carragh Maloney: $30k → 9%The Jane Goodall Institute: $5k → 6%Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation: $20k → 7%Animal Care Centers NYC: $20k → 17%Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: $20k → 9%HOPE: $30k → 7%Animal Care and Control: $10k → 17%HOPE: $20k → 7%Wildlife Freedom Foundation Inc: $25k → 17%Wildlife Freedom Foundation Inc: $20k → 17%Wildlife Wildlife Freedom Foundation Inc: $20k → 17%Animal Medical Center: $30k → 17%Animal Medical Center: $20k → 17%Animal Haven: $5k → 17%Animal Haven: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
UT
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$445k · 14 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$445k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+86%

Still filing today

86%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
AnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H
    HOPE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +831% · 74% of their budget
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AC
    Animal Care Centers NYC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k
  • AC
    Alley Cat Allies Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
9
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
10
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
11
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
12
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Panthera Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTERTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · AnimalsTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INCWILDLIFE FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE FREEDOM FOUNDATION INCWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $40,000 · AnimalsWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO A…SAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $20,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE CHIMPS INCAlley Cat Allies Inc: $15,000 · Animals+4 more: $40,000 · Animals+4 moreOur Companion Animal Rescue: $60,000 · OtherOur Companion Animal RescueHOPE: $50,000 · OtherHOPEIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBest Friends Animal Society - att Carragh Maloney: $30,000 · OtherBest Friends Animal Society - att Carragh MaloneyHelping Hands Monkey Helpers: $20,000 · OtherHelping Hands Monkey HelpersAnimal Care Centers NYC: $20,000 · OtherAnimal Care Centers NYCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWildlife Wildlife Freedom Foundation Inc: $20,000 · OtherWildlife Wildlife Freedom Foundation IncAnimal Care and Control: $10,000 · OtherTiger Haven: $10,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20,000 · Environment
Animals$310,000Other$280,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE: $50,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWILDLIFE FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 60% of budgetWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPANTHERA CORPORATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice Turner Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice Turner Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alice Turner Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Alice Turner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice Turner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph