Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.2M
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$4,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$25,000
VIRGINIA TECH$24,000
UNIV OF MARY WASHINGTON$19,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$18,000
LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLLEGE$13,500
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$7,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$6,000
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY$6,000
HOLLINS COLLEGE$6,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV$5,000
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$5,000
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$5,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$4,500
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNC-WILMINGTON: $7k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $36k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 7%LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $160k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $23k → 8%UNIV OF MARY WASHINGTON: $19k → 15%SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $14k → 17%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 18%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY: $6k → 20%VIRGINIA TECH: $24k → 21%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $9k → 22%RADFORD UNIVERSITY: $6k → 25%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 29%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $22k → 6%LFCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 7%HOLLINS COLLEGE: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%UNIV OF MARY WASHINGTON: $16k → 15%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $17k → 18%VIRGINIA TECH: $10k → 21%RADFORD UNIVERSITY: $6k → 25%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 29%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $17k → 6%LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLL: $19k → 7%HOLLINS COLLEGE: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $18k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON: $8k → 15%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $17k → 18%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 29%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 6%LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $14k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $16k → 8%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $17k → 18%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 29%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $14k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $11k → 29%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $12k → 8%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 29%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $9k → 29%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
WV
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 38 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
19

Total granted

$1.1M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+10%

Still filing today

26%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +75%
  • AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +26%
  • SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LF
    LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLL
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • U
    UNC-WILMINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • NV
    NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
2
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
10
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Savannah College of Art and DesignInc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $200,441 · OtherLORD FAIRFAX COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $107,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $102,500 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $94,000 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $74,500 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITYUNIV OF MARY WASHINGTON: $52,000 · OtherCHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $38,000 · Other+38 more: $385,559 · Other+38 moreLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $34,500 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERS…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $32,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVER…SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $17,000 · EducationSHENANDOAH UNIV…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIV…SWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationSWARTHMORE COLL…Elon University: $9,500 · EducationElon UniversityBenedictine College: $8,000 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $7,000 · Education+9 more: $25,500 · Education+9 more
Other$1,054,500Education$166,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElon University: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR CREST COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERRUM COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Elon University ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Mennonite University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hughes Memorial HomeVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hughes Memorial Home · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · John William Rollison Jr Education Fund · Lonza L Rush Tes Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Interfaith America · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice M & William E Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph