Skip to content
Alfred & Nancy Dilamani Steven Michael & Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Alfred & Nancy Dilamani Steven Michael & Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$47kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$4kInternational$1kEducation$720Health$180
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
5
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA$8,223
Individual grant recipient$2,160
YES FOUNDATION$1,000
TIFERET RAFAEL$860
BENOT MENACHEM SCHOOL$720
NEEMAN FOUNDATION$720
GLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK$400
Individual grant recipient$360
Individual grant recipient$360
TORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC$360
BIKE 4 CHAI$283
JGIVE FRIENDS OF ASOR LAKEWOOD$126
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEEMAN FOUNDATION: $720 → 16%SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION: $180 → 8%YES FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA: $18k → 6%MELVILLE JEWISH: $100 → 7%JCRC: $100 → 17%GLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $400 → 20%TIFERET RAFAEL: $860 → 13%JGIVE FRIENDS OF ASOR LAKEWOOD: $126 → 11%UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA: $11k → 6%IRGUN YRA: $360 → 17%TIFERET SHLOMO: $360 → 20%BIKE 4 CHAI: $283 → 11%UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA: $8k → 6%SHAARE TEFILLAH: $2k → 17%BENOT MENACHEM SCHOOL: $720 → 20%UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA: $8k → 6%SHAARE TEFILLAH: $540 → 17%TORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC: $360 → 20%UNITED MASHADI JEWISH FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ZOA: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA INC: $45,720 · OtherUNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMUNITY OF AMERICA INCUNITED MASHADI JEWISH FOUNDATION: $3,665 · OtherUNITED MASHADI JEWISH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,700 · Other+10 more: $4,409 · Other+10 moreNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $720 · InternationalGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $400 · InternationalTORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC: $360 · InternationalSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $180 · Health
Other$56,494International$1,480Health$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alfred & Nancy Dilamani Steven Michael & Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alfred & Nancy Dilamani Steven Michael & Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alfred & Nancy Dilamani Steven Michael & Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home