Skip to content
Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$548k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.4M
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $392k
$28,766
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$93,851
PENN STATE BERKS$88,412
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$85,260
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$64,327
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$60,540
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$30,646
RAMAPO COLLEGE$28,766
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY$25,000
RAMAPO COLLEGE$20,601
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$13,015
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$10,000
PRATT INSTITUTE$10,000
THE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA FDN INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$7,985
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $81k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS: $88k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $73k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - REBECCA: $53k → 19%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $44k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $107k → 8%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $85k → 14%SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - B STASZA: $51k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $150k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $75k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES: $85k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $67k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $53k → 19%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY - KAROLINA OZGA: $34k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $94k → 8%SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - B STASZA: $31k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $143k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $73k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES: $31k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $61k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $74k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $106k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $70k → 10%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $45k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - KRYSTAL CASTILLO: $64k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $103k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $77k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $61k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $38k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $70k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $42k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $42k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $31k → 22%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $35k → 7%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $30k → 7%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $30k → 7%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $64k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $56k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $41k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $40k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $33k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $31k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY: $43k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY - K SAS: $42k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY - K SAS: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
DE
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 42 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
14

Total granted

$4.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+37%

Still filing today

17%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
    5× · 2018–2022 · $157k · revenue +70%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +30%
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • KU
    KEAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - KRYSTIAN KRUCON
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $556,556 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXISNEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $391,237 · OtherNEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $298,703 · OtherVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWARUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $284,552 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLOUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $209,342 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATAGEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $199,592 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $163,029 · OtherPENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES: $147,922 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $143,279 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - REBECCA: $135,243 · Other+37 more: $1,339,912 · Other+37 moreSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $156,517 · EducationSACRED HEART …THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $85,260 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …The George Washington University: $66,540 · EducationThe George Wa…University of San Francisco: $52,985 · EducationUniversity of…Fairleigh Dickinson University: $40,000 · EducationFairleigh Dic…FELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $31,000 · EducationFELICIAN UNIV…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,646 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…PRATT INSTITUTE: $30,000 · EducationPRATT INSTITU…+6 more: $44,515 · Education+6 more
Other$3,869,367Education$537,463

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $156,517 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $85,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $66,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $52,985 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $50,476 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,646 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $13,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe State College of Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $4,822 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
  • Who funds FELICIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home