Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$548k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$4.4M
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $392k
$28,766
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$93,851
PENN STATE BERKS$88,412
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$85,260
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$64,327
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$60,540
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$30,646
RAMAPO COLLEGE$28,766
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY$25,000
RAMAPO COLLEGE$20,601
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$13,015
THE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA FDN INC$10,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$10,000
PRATT INSTITUTE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$7,985
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $81k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS: $88k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $73k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - REBECCA: $53k → 19%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $44k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $107k → 8%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $85k → 14%SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - B STASZA: $51k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $150k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $75k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES: $85k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $67k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $53k → 19%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY - KAROLINA OZGA: $34k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $94k → 8%SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - B STASZA: $31k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $143k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $73k → 10%PENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES: $31k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $61k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $74k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $106k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA: $70k → 10%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA: $45k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - KRYSTAL CASTILLO: $64k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $103k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $77k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $61k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS: $38k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $70k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO: $42k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA: $42k → 22%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $31k → 22%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $35k → 7%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $30k → 7%RAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN: $30k → 7%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $64k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $56k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $42k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $41k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $40k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $33k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $31k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY: $43k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY - K SAS: $42k → 16%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY - K SAS: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
DE
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 42 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
14

Total granted

$4.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+37%

Still filing today

17%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
    5× · 2018–2022 · $157k · revenue +70%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +30%
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • KU
    KEAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY - KRYSTIAN KRUCON
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

10
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXIS — $556,556 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - ALEXISNEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $391,237 · OtherNEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWA — $298,703 · OtherVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY - MAGDALENA LEJAWARUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLO — $284,552 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY - K CASTILLOUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATA — $209,342 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - MALGORZATAGEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - NATALIA — $199,592 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGE - WENDY MARROQUIN — $163,029 · OtherPENN STATE BERKS - MELANIE REYES — $147,922 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY — $143,279 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - REBECCA — $135,243 · Other+37 more — $1,339,912 · Other+37 moreSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $156,517 · EducationSACRED HEART …THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $85,260 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …The George Washington University — $66,540 · EducationThe George Wa…University of San Francisco — $52,985 · EducationUniversity of…Fairleigh Dickinson University — $40,000 · EducationFairleigh Dic…FELICIAN UNIVERSITY — $31,000 · EducationFELICIAN UNIV…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $30,646 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…PRATT INSTITUTE — $30,000 · EducationPRATT INSTITU…+6 more — $44,515 · Education+6 more
Other$3,869,367Education$537,463

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $156,517 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $85,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $66,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $52,985 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $50,476 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY — $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $30,646 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $13,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe State College of Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $4,822 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds The George Washington University
  • Who funds University of San Francisco
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University
  • Who funds FELICIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alfred & Adele Olejarz Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • University of Delaware25% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology12% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University1% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University0% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph