Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alex Capecelatro and Brian Stevens Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$390k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Twenty Summers$10,000
Fine Arts Center$3,500
ProvinceTown Commons$2,500
StartoutOrg$2,500
The Trevor Project$1,000
Association of Historical Accuracy$1,000
Angelfood$186
St Peter the Apostle Church$100
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Twenty Summers: $10k → 8%StartoutOrg: $3k → 10%Angelfood: $186 → 14%Association of Historical Accuracy: $1k → 17%Fine Arts Center: $4k → 8%The Trevor Project: $1k → 14%ProvinceTown Commons: $3k → 8%St Peter the Apostle Church: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

20 Summers Inc: $10,000 · Arts & Culture20 Summers IncFine Arts Center: $3,500 · OtherFine Arts CenterStartoutOrg: $2,500 · OtherStartoutOrgAssociation of Historical Accuracy: $1,000 · OtherAssociation of Historical Accuracy+2 more: $286 · OtherPROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC: $2,500 · Community ImprovementPROVINCETOWN …TREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$10,000Other$7,286Community Improvement$2,500Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget20 Summers Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 20 Summers Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alex Capecelatro and Brian Stevens’ filings →

More from the funding graph