Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Albert M & Lyda M Green Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of ALBERT M & LYDA M GREEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$791k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT$15,000
BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT USA: $10k → 11%ALISTER MCKENZIE SOCIETY: $1k → 13%THE REAGAN RANCH: $2k → 14%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSER: $10k → 10%FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE: $3k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $15k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE TURFGRASS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE TURFGRASS FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%ELIZABETH LANE OLIVER CENTER: $1k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY-TURFGRASS: $2k → 16%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $10k → 14%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $5k → 14%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT: $5k → 14%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $10k → 10%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $10k → 14%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $10k → 10%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $10k → 10%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 10%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $10k → 10%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $10k → 14%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $10k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $1k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $1k → 14%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 10%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 10%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 10%BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 10%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $5k → 10%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $5k → 10%BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$385k · 8 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$385k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+139%

Still filing today

75%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +3%
  • BA
    BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +515%
  • BA
    BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +139%
  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY-TURFGRASS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Association Inc

The mission of the foreign policy association today, as it has been for over 100 years, is to serve as a catalyst for developing awareness, understanding, and informed opinion on united states foreign policy and global issues. through its…

International
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
Friends of Ga State Parks & Histori

The mission of friends is to partner with, promote and preserve georgia state parks & historic sites. statewide, friends works to raise awareness of the economic and intrinsic values of georgia's greatest treasures. we work with state and…

Human Services
4
American Center for Freedom

The american center for freedom will educate the public on critical violations of american sovereignty and illustrate that our laws are being compromised by international agreements and binding resolutions. with a focus on american…

5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
The Harry S Truman Library Institute National and International Affairs

To preserve and promote the enduring legacy of harry s. truman, america's 33rd president.

Education
8
Business Executives for National Security

Bens applies industry experience and best business practices to help address our nation's pressing national security challenges.

International
9
The Fort Ticonderoga Association

See schedule othe fort ticonderoga association's mission is to preserve, educate, and provoke an active discussion about the past and its importantance to present and future generations. we foster an on-going dialogue surrounding citizens,…

Arts & Culture
10
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
11
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
12
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Friends of Point Betsie Lighthouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $125,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESBENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $96,500 · OtherBENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETYHILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT — $55,000 · OtherHILLSDALE COLLEGE LIBERTY PROJECT+7 more — $28,000 · Other+7 moreBENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC — $63,000 · ReligionBENZIE AREA CHRIS…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Public BenefitGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$304,500Religion$63,000Public Benefit$30,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$4,000Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $125,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $96,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetBENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC — $63,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
  • Who funds BENZIE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Albert M & Lyda M Green Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Albert M & Lyda M Green Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Albert M & Lyda M Green Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph