Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$860k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0156% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MScience & Tech$426kEducation$161kPhilanthropy$100kSocial Science$500Environment$200Animals$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$94M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$250,000
DR QUARRAISHA ABDOOL KARIM$125,000
DR SALIM ABDOOL KARIM$125,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
RESEARCH AMERICA$50,000
AMERICAN PHYSICAN SCIENTIST ASSOCIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 66% of grant dollars ($4.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 34% that went abroad ($2.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN PHYSICAN SCIENTIST ASSOCIA: $10k → 8%U MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHIC: $500 → 22%SCIENCE COMMUNICATION LAB: $20k → 10%MICHAEL GRUNSTEIN: $125k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM: $250k → 17%BIOTECH WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $1k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%JOAN A STEITZ: $250k → 12%JEFFERSON COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL: $100 → 15%RESEARCH AMERICA: $50k → 9%DOUGLAS LOWY: $125k → 8%AMHERST-PELHAM REGIONAL SCHOOL DIST: $25k → 12%UCLA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%FUND FOR PARK AVENUE: $200 → 17%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%RESEARCH AMERICA: $50k → 9%JOHN SCHILLER: $125k → 8%CHARLES D ALLIS: $125k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150k → 14%RESEARCH AMERICA: $25k → 9%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $100 → 14%RESEARCH AMERICA: $10k → 9%STRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNE: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 34% of all-years giving ($2.0M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Switzerland$500k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$500k · 3 grants
Germany$300k · 3 grants
Hong Kong$250k · 1 grant
Netherlands$250k · 1 grant
Australia$125k · 1 grant
Denmark$100k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$435k · 4 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
38

Total granted

$435k
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $810k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Science & TechEducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    2× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +3%
  • SC
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION LAB INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +110%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
7
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
8
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The George Washington University; the most unlike its peers is The Paul C Richards and Gladys W Richards Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherGAVI ALLIANCE: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · Other+32 more: $3,020,700 · Other+32 moreNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150,100 · Science & TechSCIENCE COMMUNICATION LAB INC: $140,000 · Science & TechSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Science & Tech+1 more: $1,000 · Science & TechPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $250,000 · HealthTHE PAUL C RICHARDS AND GLADYS W RICHARDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $50,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC: $200 · Environment
Other$5,270,700Science & Tech$341,100Health$250,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$60,500Environment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCIENCE COMMUNICATION LAB INC: $140,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA: $135,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE COMMUNICATION LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCHAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE PAUL C RICHARDS AND GLADYS W RICHARDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Albert & Mary Lasker’s filings →

More from the funding graph