Skip to content

· Private foundation

Akerson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$845k
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.1MFood & Nutrition$805kYouth Development$115kEmployment$37kHuman Services$35kHealth$25kEnvironment$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3k
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $155k
  • $10k–50k44 grants · $540k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$150,000
SARAH SEDEK CO UNIVERSITY OF VIRGIN$44,676
ALEXANDRA CARAUS CO VIRGINIA TECH U$15,000
JUSTIN GARCIA CO VIRGINIA TECH UNIV$14,095
ANILA ZIAI CO GEORGE MASON UNIVERSI$12,555
TAREK KHALIFA CO UVA COLLEGE AT WIS$12,500
HEROMEN NEGASH CO UNIVERSITY OF VIR$12,500
AMEERAH BYFIELD CO GEORGE MASON UNI$12,500
SUSHMITA CHOWDHURY CO VIRGINIA TECH$12,500
DYLAN CAIA PLUMMER CO UNIVERSITY OF$12,500
DAVINA GYAMFI CO UNIVERSITY OF VIRG$12,500
RUTH FIKRU KEBEBEW CO VIRGINIA COMM$12,500
ABENEZER GELASHE CO VIRGINIA TECH U$12,500
WEHBE EL HADJ SIDI CO GEORGE MASON$12,500
PERLA BELLEN CABRERA TORRES CO GEOR$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SADQ MUBARAK CO HARVARD COLLEGE: $13k → 8%TRAVIS MANION FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%TEJASWINI VUTUKURI CO UNIVERSITY OF: $13k → 11%ALISON AVELAR CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%BROOKE SMITH CO GEORGETOWN UNIVERSI: $10k → 14%AMENA SAFI CO UNIVERSITY OF COLORAD: $10k → 10%BASSEM SLITI CO MARYMOUNT UNIVERSIT: $11k → 7%SARAH SEDEK CO UNIVERSITY OF VIRGIN: $45k → 8%MELKITE ABRAHAM DAWIT CO HAMPTON UN: $13k → 14%DYLAN CAIA PLUMMER CO UNIVERSITY OF: $13k → 15%ALEXANDRA CARAUS CO VIRGINIA TECH U: $15k → 21%RUTH FIKRU KEBEBEW CO VIRGINIA COMM: $13k → 22%TAREK KHALIFA CO UVA COLLEGE AT WIS: $13k → 22%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $500k → 19%ANILA ZIAI CO GEORGE MASON UNIVERSI: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $250k → 14%LANGLEY SCHOOL INC: $25k → 6%HEROMEN NEGASH CO UNIVERSITY OF VIR: $13k → 8%JUSTIN GARCIA CO VIRGINIA TECH UNIV: $14k → 21%WEHBE EL HADJ SIDI CO GEORGE MASON: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $200k → 14%DAVINA GYAMFI CO UNIVERSITY OF VIRG: $13k → 8%SUSHMITA CHOWDHURY CO VIRGINIA TECH: $13k → 21%NOMAN ARAM CO JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS: $13k → 19%AMEERAH BYFIELD CO GEORGE MASON UNI: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $150k → 14%SUDHATRI DIYA SHARMA CO UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%ABIGAIL CHAFFIN CO VIRGINIA TECH UN: $13k → 21%PERLA BELLEN CABRERA TORRES CO GEOR: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $150k → 14%EVERY1 CAN WORK: $37k → 6%MOHAMED ELHAWABRI CO UNIVERSITY OF: $11k → 8%LUKE MAUPIN CO VIRGINIA TECH UNIVER: $13k → 21%MILES DAVID JONES CO GEORGE MASON U: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $100k → 14%SIMON BRODY TNAIB CO VIRGINIA TECH: $13k → 21%IKRA ISMAIL HUSSEIN CO GEORGE MASON: $13k → 22%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $100k → 14%ABENEZER GELASHE CO VIRGINIA TECH U: $13k → 21%ASMA HEMAT CO GEORGE MASON UNIVERSI: $10k → 22%JOSEPH ROBERT SHAW FDN: $25k → 14%HORTONS KIDS INC: $40k → 14%HORTONS KIDS INC: $25k → 14%HORTONS KIDS INC: $20k → 14%THE WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $500k → 14%THE WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $300k → 14%THE WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $50k → 14%Hortons Kids Inc: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
MA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 34 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 75 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
54

Total granted

$2.4M
$954k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+48%

Still filing today

6%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $695k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $950k · revenue +39%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $850k · revenue -36%
  • HK
    HORTON'S KIDS INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $115k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • EC
    EVERY1 CAN WORKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $37k · revenue +65%
  • TM
    Travis Manion Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
2
Martha's Table Inc

Martha's table works to support stronger children, stronger families, and stronger communities by increasing access to quality education programs, healthy food, and family supports.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
6
Little Keswick Education Corporation

Keswick school was founded in 1963 as little keswick school by bob and libby wilson, two local public school teachers who started the school on their 25 acre farm (little keswick farm) outside of charlottesville, va. initially a summer…

Education
7
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
8
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
9
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
10
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
11
The Dc Central Kitchen Inc

We use food as a tool to strengthen bodies, empower minds, and build communities. dcck prepares people facing high barriers to employment for culinary careers, and creates jobs for our graduates through innovative programs that expand…

—
12
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bread for the City Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joseph Robert Shaw Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYHORTON'S KIDS INC: $115,000 · OtherHORTON'S KIDS INC+153 more: $1,496,087 · Other+153 moreCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $950,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $850,000 · EducationWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GI…+1 more: $25,000 · EducationTravis Manion Foundation: $35,000 · PhilanthropyJOSEPH ROBERT SHAW FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthNATUREBRIDGE: $5,000 · EnvironmentThe Kiefer Foundation: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,111,087Food & Nutrition$955,000Education$875,000Philanthropy$35,000Health$25,000Environment$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $950,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $850,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetHORTON'S KIDS INC: $115,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetEVERY1 CAN WORK: $37,360 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kiefer Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY1 CAN WORK ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH ROBERT SHAW FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Akerson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Akerson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Akerson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph