· Public charity
Agritech Institute for Small Farms Inc
To promote agritech tool usage by small farms that promotes improved financial and environmental performance and enables them to combat climate change.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WINSTON PROUTY CENTER | $175,000 |
| DOWNTOWN BRATTLEBORO ALLIANCE INC | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Agritech Institute for Small Farms Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agritech Institute for Small Farms Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Downtown Brattleboro Alliance Inc: 12% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Agritech Institute for Small Farms’ filings →