Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Agricultural Health Benefits Alliance Educational Foundation LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of Agricultural Health Benefits Alliance Educational Foundation LLC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teresa Madrigal Aguilar co Amer Col$4,250
Gonzalo Murillo De Haro co MTS Trai$4,000
Daniel Pelayo co Univ Tech Inst$4,000
Ariani Diaz Hernandez co SD State U$4,000
Fernando Delgado Pizana co A class$4,000
Luis Garcia Rodriguez co JGC Truck$4,000
Abigail Wetzel co UC Berkeley$4,000
Jazmin Ortiz Ayala co Sacramento St$3,500
Angelina Caporale co Creative Mind$2,500
Lyzet Montanez Hurtado co Stanford$2,500
Gerardo Gabriel Portera co UC DAvis$2,000
Tilly Lewelling Dodd co Ft Lewis Co$1,500
Jasmin Miranda Perez co Napa Valley$1,500
Justice Penterman co UC Berkeley$1,500
Nicola Pellacani co Sonoma St Univ$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.

Which US states your grants reach

MA
IN
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
TX

Grants placed by each grantee’s location, read from the 990 filings.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$82k · 12 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
33

Total granted

$82k
$107k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    Samantha Diaz co Marysville Univers
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
  • MP
    Monce Perez co Sac State Univ
    2× · 2022–2023 · $9k
  • DT
    Daniela Tapia CO Chico State Univ
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k

Funded once

  • CE
    Cruz Esquivel co Amblard Leather Ac
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • WL
    Wyatt Levi Gray CO UCLA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EG
    Eduardo Gonzalex CO Chico State Uni
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20202025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Samantha Diaz co Marysville Univers — $9,500 · OtherMonce Perez co Sac State Univ — $9,000 · OtherDaniela Tapia CO Chico State Univ — $8,500 · OtherVeronica Solorio co Sac State Unive — $8,500 · OtherDiego Guerrero co CSU Sacramento — $8,000 · Other+61 more — $194,920 · Other+61 more
Other$238,420

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Agricultural Health Benefits Alliance Educational Foundation LLC?

Find your warmest path to Agricultural Health Benefits Alliance Educational Foundation LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph