Skip to content

· Private foundation

Agrawal Jajodia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$98kArts & Culture$13kEducation$2kHuman Services$360Public Safety & Disaster$250Youth Development$200Health$20
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$351
Median grant
4
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAMANAND VISHWA HITKARINI PARISHAD$17,500
Individual grant recipient$4,001
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,701
CONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE$1,208
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ISKCON$351
SIMSBURY SCHOOL$200
SEABURY CARES$50
Individual grant recipient$50
Individual grant recipient$50
EASTER SEALS$20
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$20
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAMANAND VISHWA HITKARINI PARISHAD: $18k → 8%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $18k → 7%Brahma Kumaris: $251 → 9%SEABURY CARES: $50 → 11%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $20 → 17%EASTER SEALS: $20 → 14%Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $5k → 8%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $17k → 7%INDIA ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%RAMANAND VISHWA HITKARINI PARISHAD: $5k → 8%CONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE: $5k → 7%INDIA ART: $2k → 11%Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $3k → 8%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $5k → 7%Milan Cultural Association: $4k → 11%Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $3k → 8%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $3k → 7%HARE KRISHNA TEMPLE: $2k → 11%Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $3k → 8%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $3k → 7%Milan Cultural Association: $1k → 11%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $3k → 7%HARE KRISHNA TEMPLE: $501 → 11%CONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE: $1k → 7%ISKCON: $351 → 11%Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $101 → 7%ISKCON OF CONNECTICUT: $151 → 11%MILAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $125 → 11%POWER OF PIECE: $250 → 11%SIMSBURY ABC: $1k → 11%FRIENDS OF SIMSBURY CREW: $550 → 11%SIMSBURY SCHOOL: $200 → 11%Simsbury Meadows Performing Arts Ce: $175 → 11%SIMSBURY FIRE DEPT: $100 → 11%Simsbury Meadows Performing Arts Ce: $100 → 11%Simsbury Volunteer Fire: $50 → 11%BALLAV DHAM: $4k → 11%SIMSBURY POLICE: $50 → 11%VALLABHDHAM TEMPLE: $51 → 11%SIMSBURY FIRE DEPT: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 6 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$99k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+25%

Still filing today

17%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k
  • RV
    Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad
    6× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue -4%
  • MC
    Milan Cultural Association Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • IA
    INDIA ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SIMSBURY CREW INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $550 · revenue +27%
  • BK
    Brahma Kumaris
    one grant, 2017 · $251
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple: $54,685 · OtherConnecticut Valley Hindu TempleIndividual grant recipient: $4,001 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,202 · Other+15 more: $4,970 · Other+15 moreRamanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $36,500 · ReligionRamanand Vishwa Hitkarini ParishadMilan Cultural Association Inc: $5,623 · Arts & CultureMilan Cult…INDIA ARTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureINDIA ARTS…FRIENDS OF SIMSBURY CREW INC: $550 · EducationTHE SIMSBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC: $50 · Public Safety & DisasterAARP FOUNDATION: $40 · Human Services
Other$65,858Religion$36,500Arts & Culture$10,623Education$550Public Safety & Disaster$50Human Services$40

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRamanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad: $36,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF SIMSBURY CREW INC: $550 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SIMSBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ramanand Vishwa Hitkarini Parishad ↗
  • Who funds Milan Cultural Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIA ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SIMSBURY CREW INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SIMSBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agrawal Jajodia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agrawal Jajodia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Agrawal Jajodia’s filings →

More from the funding graph