Skip to content
Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc

The effective and efficient development, financial management and granting of philanthropic support for st.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$956k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$4.5MHousing & Shelter$104kYouth Development$100kHuman Services$98kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,566,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,698,651 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $132,033 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $221k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$79,498
Median grant
1
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC$955,756
ST FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN INC$355,219
WAUPUN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$91,145
REBUILDING TOGETHER FOX VALLEY$79,498
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC$50,000
HOLY FAMILY WARMING SHELTER$25,000
TREFFERT WAY SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Christian Home & Rehabilitation Center Incorporated: $87k → 9%The Christian Home & Rehabilitation Center Incorporated: $6k → 9%The Christian Home & Rehabilitation Center Incorporated: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 80%.

Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 6 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$4.7M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +33%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $507k · revenue +22%
  • WM
    WAUPUN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • RM
    RIPON MEDICAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +7%
  • SH
    SSM HEALTH CARE OF WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1 · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Home Health United Inc

Promote optimal health and quality of life to those we serve through our exceptional, comprehensive care both at home and in the community.

Health
2
Home Care United Inc

Promote optimal health and quality of life to those we serve through our exceptional, comprehensive care at home and in the community.

Health
3
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
4
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
5
St Mary's Foundation Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
6
St Mary's Hospital Centralia Illinois

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
7
Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc

The effective and efficient development, financial management and granting of philanthropic support for st. agnes hosp, waupun memorial hosp, ripon medical center, st. francis home of fdl, sisters servants of christ the king villa loretto,…

—
8
Ssm Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
9
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
10
Hhu Xtra Care Inc

Promote optimal health and quality of life to those we serve through our exceptional, comprehensive care at home and in the community.

Human Services
11
Good Samaritan Regional Health Center

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
12
St Anthony Shawnee Hospital Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sister Servants of Christ the King Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Fond Du Lac Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC: $3,447,434 · HealthAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INCST FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN INC: $507,411 · HealthST FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN INCWAUPUN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $349,823 · HealthWAUPUN MEMORIAL HOSPITALSISTER SERVANTS OF CHRIST THE KING INC: $160,360 · Health+2 more: $22,501 · HealthREBUILDING TOGETHER FOX VALLEY INC: $79,498 · Housing & ShelterHOLY FAMILY HOME FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHRISTIAN HOME & REHABILITATION CTR: $98,138 · Human ServicesNFDL CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Other
Health$4,487,529Housing & Shelter$104,498Youth Development$100,000Human Services$98,138Other$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC: $3,447,434 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN INC: $507,411 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWAUPUN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $349,823 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSISTER SERVANTS OF CHRIST THE KING INC: $160,360 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN HOME & REHABILITATION CTR: $98,138 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER FOX VALLEY INC: $79,498 over 1y, 15% of budgetHOLY FAMILY HOME FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetRIPON MEDICAL CENTER INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSSM HEALTH CARE OF WISCONSIN INC: $1 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Agnesian Healthcare Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agnesian Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home