Skip to content

· Public charity

African American Mayors Assocation

To empower local leaders for the benefit of their citizens.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Public Benefit$975kHealth$355kYouth Development$230kHousing & Shelter$200kReligion$175kPhilanthropy$155kFood & Nutrition$88kCivil Rights$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $970,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,023,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $366k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $605k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Goodr Inc$175,000
City of Savannah$155,000
City of New Orleans Health Departme$125,000
Finance Department BGCGW$75,000
Healthy Maywood West Cook$75,000
Zencity Technologies US Inc$40,500
City of Memphis$30,000
City of Newport News$30,000
City of Greenville$30,000
Philadelphia City Fund$30,000
The City of East Point$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
City of Durham$30,000
City of North Lauderdale$30,000
City of Jackson MS$30,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$520k · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$520k
$905k

Still filing today

0%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $911k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    City of Little Rock AR
    2× · 2023–2024 · $155k
  • FO
    FOR OUR CITY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $155k
  • CO
    CITY OF GREENVILLE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $105k

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Baltimore
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • FC
    FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +21%
  • GR
    GREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Baltimore: $200,000 · OtherCity of BaltimoreGoodr Inc: $175,000 · OtherGoodr IncCity of Savannah: $155,000 · OtherCity of SavannahCity of Little Rock AR: $155,000 · OtherCity of Little Rock ARFOR OUR CITY: $155,000 · OtherFOR OUR CITYHealthy BR: $125,000 · OtherHealthy BRCITY OF NEW ORLEANS - NOPD: $125,000 · OtherCITY OF NEW ORLEANS - NOPDCITY OF GREENVILLE: $105,000 · OtherCITY OF GREENVILLECity of Mt Vernon NY: $105,000 · OtherCity of Mt Vernon NYCity of North Miami: $75,000 · OtherHealthy Maywood West Cook: $75,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $75,000 · Other+14 more: $413,000 · Other+14 moreFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATIO…GREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $30,000 · PhilanthropyPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementRANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $12,500 · Human Services
Other$1,938,000Housing & Shelter$200,000Philanthropy$155,000Community Improvement$30,000Human Services$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC: $125,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetMEMPHIS CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCANDID: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National League of Cities Institute IncDC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National League of Cities Institute Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization African American Mayors Assocation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from African American Mayors Assocation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on African American Mayors Assocation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph