Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

West Virginia · Public charity

Advantage Valley Inc

Grow economic opportunity for all residents of the Charleston-Huntington Metro area by increasing investments in the region, leveraging resources and building collaboration among community stakeholders.

$133k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Itemized grants FY2024
19
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$52k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$18,750
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.3M
71% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$195kFood & Nutrition$18kHealth$9kScience & Tech$8kHousing & Shelter$6kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2024.

Individual grant recipient$18,750
The Arctic Fox Cafe$3,000
TwelvePole Trading Post LLC$3,000
EchoLit LLC$3,000
HER Body Shop LLC$3,000
Okieme Davis Lawncare$3,000
Williamson Mental Health$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Bracket Sportz LLC$2,990
Terra Fate Exotics LLC$2,988
Joe Public Press Limited Co$2,988
Detailed Precise Handyman LLC$2,901

Compare Advantage Valley Inc with peer funders

About Advantage Valley Inc

How much does Advantage Valley Inc give?
Advantage Valley Inc reported 12 itemized grants totaling $51,617, out of $132,979 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Advantage Valley Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (72%), Food & Nutrition (6%), Health (3%).
Where is Advantage Valley Inc based?
Advantage Valley Inc is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Advantage Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home