Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adalman Goodwin Foundation Inc

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2017
11
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $603k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION$1,055,954
PEABODY INSTITUTE OF JHU$125,000
UNIV OF MD BALTIMORE FOUNDATION$100,000
BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$100,000
ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES$78,371
MT WASHINGTON MEDICAL HOSPITAL$50,000
ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES$50,000
LYRIC OPERA BALTIMORE FOUNDATION$50,000
GOUCHER COLLEGE$50,000
CENTRAL SCHOLARSHIP BUREAU$46,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MT WASHINGTON MEDICAL HOSPITAL: $50k → 11%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $1.1M → 11%PEABODY INSTITUTE OF JHU: $125k → 19%CENTRAL SCHOLARSHIP BUREAU: $46k → 11%BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $100k → 19%GOUCHER COLLEGE: $50k → 11%UNIV OF MD BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES: $78k → 19%ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES: $50k → 19%LYRIC OPERA BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%UNIV OF BALTIMOREPASSAGER: $20k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $1,055,954 · OtherBALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATIONASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES: $128,371 · OtherASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIESPEABODY INSTITUTE OF JHU: $125,000 · OtherPEABODY INSTITUTE OF JHULYRIC OPERA BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherMT WASHINGTON MEDICAL HOSPITAL: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $66,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…GOUCHER COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationGOUCHER C…BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $100,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,475,325Education$150,000Arts & Culture$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTRAL SCHOLARSHIP BUREAU INC: $46,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL SCHOLARSHIP BUREAU INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adalman Goodwin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adalman Goodwin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc: 11% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adalman Goodwin’s filings →

More from the funding graph