· Public charity
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Inc No Ca Chap
To provide scholarships to academically outstanding united states citizens studying to complete their degrees in science, medicine and engineering, thereby contributing to the worldwide advancement of science and technology.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO | $215,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS | $210,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - BERKELEY | $195,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA CRUZ | $180,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $165,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY | $140,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - MERCED | $83,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - BERKELEY9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Inc No Ca Chap funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Inc No Ca Chap. Bigger dots raise more.