Skip to content
ACFE Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

ACFE Foundation

ACFE Foundation's mission is to increase the body of anti-fraud knowledge and support future anti-fraud professionals worldwide through the funding of scholarships, endowments, research and other educational projects.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$67kEducation$51k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $15,490, the rows itemized in this filing. The $145,490 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $130,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$9,940
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Univ of Nebraska - Lincoln$9,940
Belmont University$5,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Univ of Nebraska - Lincoln: $10k → 13%Carnegie Mellon University: $10k → 11%Baylor University: $15k → 16%University of Alabama: $8k → 17%Belmont University: $6k → 14%Univ of Georgia Research Fdn: $15k → 27%Old Dominion Univ Research Fo: $12k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
NE
WV
VA
TN
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $28k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$15k · 53% · 3 people

Stated purpose: Scholarships

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$7k · 25% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Scholarships

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 7% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Scholarship

South Asia$2k · 7% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Scholarship

Sub-Saharan Africa$2k · 7% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Scholarship

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $15,000 · EducationUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation IncBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $11,909 · EducationOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCBelmont University: $5,550 · EducationBelmont UniversityUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $14,987 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDACarnegie Mellon University: $10,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTHBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $7,500 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAWILLIAM & MARY: $7,500 · OtherWILLIAM & MARYFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM: $9,940 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…
Education$57,459Other$49,987Arts & Culture$9,940

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $11,909 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM: $9,940 over 1y, 20% of budgetBelmont University: $5,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization ACFE Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from ACFE Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to ACFE Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to ACFE Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on ACFE’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home