Skip to content
Acdivoca at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Acdivoca

To achieve better lives for people and communities by increasing economic prosperity and social inclusion.

$47M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$2.0M
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $1,724,547, the rows itemized in this filing. The $47,077,546 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,352,999 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,724,547
Median grant
1
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TANAGER$1,724,547
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TANAGER: $1.7M → 14%TANAGER: $283k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $44M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$18M · 42% · 214 grants

Stated purpose: APIARY DEVELOPMENT. · DROUGHT RESPONSE AND ECONOMIC STIMULUS · TECHNICAL INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE MALNUTRITION.

Central America and the Caribbean$10.0M · 23% · 125 grants

Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT OF A FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONAL OFFER OF INTEGRAL VALUE FOR THE SME-WOMAN. · SPECIAL SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM IN RESPONSE TO INCREASED MIGRATION 2020-2021. · COMMUNICATIONS PLAN AND CAPACITY BUILDING.

South America$9.2M · 21% · 144 grants

Stated purpose: YRA-02-019-G IMPLEMENT A PROCESS OF DIALOGUE, RESILIENCE AND ADVOCACY, AIMED AT YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS IN SOACHA, TO AMPLIFY AND POSITION THEIR POSITIONS AND REQUESTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COLOMBIA YOUTH PACT FOR THE BENEFIT OF COEXISTENCE AND SOCIAL COHESION. YRA-02-103-G IMPLEMENT A CREATIVE AND PRODUCTIVE TRAINING PROCESS IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND COMMUNICATIONS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SOACHA, WHICH STRENGTHENS THEIR LIFE PROJECTS, FAVORS ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITIES, PROMOTES YOUTH ASSOCIATIVITY, AND INVOLVES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY IMPACT ACTIONS. · DEVELOP A STRENGTHENING ROUTE WITH TOURISM AND HANDICRAFT ENTERPRISES TO CONSOLIDATE THREE CLUSTERS (A GROUP OF COMPANIES AND/OR ENTERPRISES IN THE SAME SECTOR, CONCENTRATED IN A GEOGRAPHIC AREA): MIT, LETICIA AND TUTUNENDO. · YRA-01-100-G STRENGTHEN YOUTH RESILIENCE OF YOUNG PEOPLE BETWEEN 10 AND 29 YEARS OF AGE IN THE TARGET AREAS OF RIOHACHA, BARRIO NAZARETH AND VILLAS DEL SUR, BY STRENGTHENING HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS AND NETWORKS, PROMOTING LEADERSHIP AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP. YRA-03-107-G STRENGTHEN SOCIAL, CULTURAL, SPORTS AND PRODUCTIVE ENTERPRISES DEVELOPED BY YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE CARACOL AND POTOS NEIGHBORHOODS OF CIUDAD BOLIVAR IN BOGOTA.

South Asia$3.2M · 7% · 191 grants

Stated purpose: COMMERCIAL ACCESS FOR AROUND 83,000 FARMERS TO GREEN WAY APP. · INCREASE OPERATIONAL CAPACITY. · IMPROVE PRODUCT QUALITY AND EXPAND MARKETS.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.4M · 3% · 39 grants

Stated purpose: REVOLVING FUNDS - ALTERNATIVE FINANCE OPTION AT THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL IN SERBIA. · SUPPORT TO ARDA. · PROFESSIONAL COURSES FOR THE AGRI-FOOD SECTOR.

Russia and Neighboring States$1.3M · 3% · 31 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VILLAGE AGENTS AS LAST MILE DELIVERY SOLUTION TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO INPUT AND INFORMATION FOR FARMERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. · SUPPORT LAUNCH OF MOBILE DIGITAL PLATFORM FOR FARMERS. · INCREASE THE EXPORT OF DRIED MULBERRY, APRICOT, AND CHERRY FROM GBAO, TAJIKISTAN, BY INCREASING SOURCING OF QUALITY MULBERRIES AND ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY OF DRIED FRUIT PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES.

East Asia and the Pacific$362k · 1% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: EYE TESTING AND GLASSES FEES. · IMPROVE VALUE CHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE. · SUPPORT VALUE CHAIN UPGRADE: SHED, DRYER.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTANAGER: $2,007,201 over 2y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Acdivoca funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Acdivoca. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Acdivoca’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home