Skip to content
Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc

Our mission is to provide the most comprehensive services to low income families to help them achieve self sufficiency and reduce the incidence of poverty in puerto rico.

$364k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$134k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.0MYouth Development$395kEmployment$375kReligion$343kEducation$172k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $249k
$35,533
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESPERANZA PARALA VEJEZ INC$133,641
CENTRO ESPERANZA$62,874
FORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO$52,027
HOGAR SANTA MADRE EUFRASIA$35,533
HOGAR SANTA TERESITA$33,880
OFICINA PARA LA PROMOCION Y DESARROLLO$22,116
PROGRAMA DE APOYO Y ENLACE COMUNITARIO$20,592
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($2.9M). The 11% that went abroad ($345k) is mapped below.

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($345k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$345k · 9 grants
How this is measured
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$3.2M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-13%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    ESPERANZA PARA LA VEJEZ INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +7%
  • CE
    CENTRO ESPERANZA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $460k · revenue +167%
  • HI
    HOGAR INFANTIL SANTA TERESITA DEL NINO JESUS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $266k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICES OF PUERTO RICO INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ESPERANZA PARA LA VEJEZ INC: $1,084,934 · Human ServicesESPERANZA PARA LA VEJEZ INCCENTRO ESPERANZA INC: $460,411 · Human ServicesCENTRO ESPERANZA INCFORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO CORP: $365,487 · Human ServicesFORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO CORPPROGRAMA DE APOYO Y ENLACE COMUNITARIO: $160,299 · Human ServicesPROGRAMA DE APOYO Y ENLACE COMUNITARIOCORPORACION HOGAR SANTA MARIA EUFRASIA: $268,859 · OtherCORPORACION HOGAR SANTA MARIA EUFRA…HOGAR INFANTIL SANTA TERESITA DEL NINO JESUS INC: $266,317 · OtherHOGAR INFANTIL SANTA TERESITA DEL N…OFICINA PARA LA PROMOCION Y EL DESARROLLO HUMANO INC: $238,923 · OtherOFICINA PARA LA PROMOCION Y EL DESA…FORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO: $155,858 · OtherFORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZOHOGAR POSADA LA VICTORIA: $73,836 · OtherHOGAR POSADA LA VICTORIA+1 more: $9,660 · OtherASOCIACION DE PERSONAS CON IMPEDIMENTOS INC: $171,789 · Education
Human Services$2,071,131Other$1,013,453Education$171,789

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESPERANZA PARA LA VEJEZ INC: $1,084,934 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetCENTRO ESPERANZA INC: $460,411 over 8y, 14% of budgetFORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO CORP: $365,487 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetHOGAR INFANTIL SANTA TERESITA DEL NINO JESUS INC: $266,317 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetASOCIACION DE PERSONAS CON IMPEDIMENTOS INC: $171,789 over 7y, 22% of budgetPROGRAMA DE APOYO Y ENLACE COMUNITARIO: $160,299 over 8y, 6.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESPERANZA PARA LA VEJEZ INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO ESPERANZA INC ↗
  • Who funds FORJANDO UN NUEVO COMIENZO CORP ↗
  • Who funds HOGAR INFANTIL SANTA TERESITA DEL NINO JESUS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASOCIACION DE PERSONAS CON IMPEDIMENTOS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROGRAMA DE APOYO Y ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICES OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondos Unidos de Puer…Puerto Rico Community…
Fondos Unidos de Puerto Rico Inc & United Way Puerto RicoPR24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondos Unidos de Puerto Rico Inc & United Way Puerto Rico · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Accion Social de Puerto Rico Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Accion Social de Puerto Rico’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home