Skip to content

· Public charity

Accelerate Action Inc

To develop and test new models for citizen organizing, particularly in communities of color, that are scalable, financially self-sustaining, and build deep, trusted relationships that can move people to take action.

$5.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Civil Rights$4.6MHuman Services$2.2MArts & Culture$2.1MPublic Benefit$1.7MScience & Tech$792kEnvironment$572k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.4M
$490,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC$1,600,000
FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY ACTION$1,550,000
PARENTSTOGETHER ACTION$1,400,000
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION$490,000
GET VOCAL PBC$400,000
WORKING AMERICAN ACTION$247,833
GALVANIZE ACTION$82,150
PROJECT PULSO INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARENTSTOGETHER: $2.2M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 3 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +125% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$6.0M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    ParentsTogether Action
    2× · 2022–2025 · $3.8M · revenue -80% · 60% of their budget
  • NM
    NOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.7M
  • GF
    Gen-Z For Change Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $500k · revenue +125% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • PF
    ParentsTogether Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2.2M · revenue +191%
  • PP
    PROJECT PULSO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $792k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fdd Action

FDD Action is a non-profit, non-partisan 504(c)4 organization established to advocate for effective policies to promote U.S. National Security and defend free nations.

Community Improvement
2
Center for Popular Democracy Inc

The center for popular democracy (cpd) and its affiliates know that everyday people have the power to change the world. we upend business and politics as usual to forge a representative, multiracial government and society where we all…

Public Benefit
3
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
4
People's Action

People's action is organized to promote economic, racial and social equity through national, regional and local advocacy campaigns.

Community Improvement
5
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
6
One Action

ONE Action's advocacy work plays a valuable role in persuading policy makers to protect, and where possible, increase funding for ONE Action's core priorities. ONE Action's supporters are highly engaged advocates and contributed valuable…

Civil Rights
7
Center for Political Accountability

The Center's mission is to bring transparency and accountability to corporate political spending. The Center sees this as ending the pervasive secrecy that hides corporate political activity from shareholders and the public.

Public Benefit
8
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
9
Public Agenda Inc

Public agenda strengthens american democracy by connecting research to action enabling people and institutions to pursue changes that make a difference. we amplify the voices of americans and help communities discover and build on common…

—
10
Friends of the Earth (Action) Inc

To improve the environment through education and policy work, with an emphasis on pollution, climate change, and energy issues; and how congress and the administration stand on these issues.

—
11
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
12
Plus Action Fund

Advocacy for Paid Family Leave for workers in the US

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gen-Z for Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC: $1,700,000 · OtherNOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLCFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY ACTION: $1,550,000 · OtherFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY ACTIONPROJECT PULSO INC: $792,226 · OtherPROJECT PULSO INCGen-Z For Change Inc: $500,000 · OtherGen-Z For Change IncGET VOCAL PBC: $400,000 · OtherGET VOCAL PBCWORKING AMERICA ACTION: $247,833 · Other+1 more: $50,000 · OtherParentsTogether Action: $3,840,000 · Public BenefitParentsTogether ActionParentsTogether Foundation: $2,200,000 · Human ServicesParentsTogether Foun…ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION INC: $490,000 · EnvironmentSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND: $82,150 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC: $100,000 · EducationFLORIDA RISING INC: $70,000 · Civil Rights
Other$5,240,059Public Benefit$3,840,000Human Services$2,200,000Environment$572,150Education$100,000Civil Rights$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetParentsTogether Action: $3,840,000 over 2y, 60% of budgetFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY ACTION: $1,550,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetGen-Z For Change Inc: $500,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ACTION INC: $490,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetWORKING AMERICA ACTION: $247,833 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFLORIDA RISING INC: $70,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Accelerate Change IncMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Accelerate Change Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Democracy Fund Voice Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · America Votes · Tides Advocacy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Accelerate Action Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Accelerate Action Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Accelerate Action Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Accelerate Action Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Accelerate Action’s filings →

    More from the funding graph