Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abraham & Esther Hersh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$821k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Abraham & Esther Hersh Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’21
3
’22
3
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.0MEducation$264kReligion$41kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $764,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $821,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Communal Fund$500,000
Shulamith School$250,000
Yeshiva University$9,800
Torah Umersorah Rabbis Fund$1,800
Sephardic Cong of Lakewood$1,000
Hakirah$1,000
Kollel Zichron Yosef Dej$1,000
02Its grantees
03Its field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyShulamith School: $250,000 · OtherShulamith SchoolFederation of Jewish Communities: $50,000 · OtherFederation of Je…Cong Ohr Torah Inc.: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $26,300 · Other+6 moreYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $13,500 · EducationMISASKIM CORP: $1,200 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,001,000Other$341,300Education$13,500Human Services$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $2,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAKIRAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT BARUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds HAKIRAH INC ↗
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Abraham & Esther Hersh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Abraham & Esther Hersh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $942k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abraham & Esther Hersh’s filings →

More from the funding graph