Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abc Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$75kHuman Services$22kEmployment$5kHealth$4kEducation$600Public Safety & Disaster$552Animals$472International$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOMCHEI SHABOS OF ROCKLAND$2,500
CHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES$2,500
MIKVAH USA$2,400
MESILAS BAIS YAAKOV$1,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN$1,000
CONG MINCHAS CHINUCH OF THE WEST SIDE$950
Individual grant recipient$950
TORAH IN MOTION USA INC$360
KOLEL RACHMISTRIVKA MONSEY$360
JEWISH RENAISSANCE CENTER$350
BAIS MEDRASH OF LAKEWOOD COMMONS$250
Individual grant recipient$250
Individual grant recipient$200
JEWISH INTUITION INC$200
WEST SIDE HATZOLOH$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AARP FOUNDATION: $18 → 14%ZAKA SEARCH & RESCUE INC: $100 → 10%AARP FOUNDATION: $16 → 14%ZAKA SEARCH & RESCUE INC: $100 → 10%ZAKA SEARCH & RESCUE INC: $72 → 10%KOOL KIDS PASSAIC: $1k → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 → 20%A TIME: $380 → 20%MISASKIM: $360 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $72 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $50 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%DOROT: $36 → 17%DOROT: $36 → 17%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $36 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 46 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
34

Total granted

$83k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+24%

Still filing today

37%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MIKVAH USA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +94%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +102%
  • TI
    TORAH IN MOTION USA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $912 · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONG OHAVEI TORAH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EY
    EZRAS YISROEL CEY CHARITY ACCOUNT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MT
    MESIVTA TIFERES YISROEL OF RIZHIN JERUSALEM
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
4
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
5
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
10
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
11
The Mikvah Ltd
Philanthropy
12
Avodat Avraham Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agudath Israel of America; the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
15/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG RACHMISTRIVKA: $19,210 · OtherCONG RACHMISTRIVKAGOMLEI CHESED OF BOYAN: $12,170 · OtherGOMLEI CHESED OF BOYANTOMCHEI SHABOS OF ROCKLAND: $5,536 · OtherTOMCHEI SHABOS OF ROCKLANDCONG OHAVEI TORAH: $5,000 · OtherCONG OHAVEI TORAHEZRAS YISROEL CEY CHARITY ACCOUNT: $5,000 · OtherEZRAS YISROEL CEY CHARITY ACCOUNTCONG MINCHAS CHINUCH OF THE WEST SIDE: $4,335 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,303 · Other+59 more: $24,709 · Other+59 moreMIKVAH USA INC: $11,600 · ReligionMIKVAH USA IN…TORAH IN MOTION USA INC: $912 · ReligionTORAH IN MOTI…+1 more: $50 · ReligionCHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · EmploymentBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,180 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $358 · HealthWest Side Hatzoloh: $280 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $252 · HealthKOOL KIDS PASSAIC INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $460 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $380 · Human ServicesIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $272 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $194 · Human Services+4 more: $192 · Human ServicesYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $400 · EducationTHE TIKVAH FUND: $200 · EducationJewish Intuition Inc: $200 · EducationSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$83,263Religion$12,562Employment$5,000Health$3,070Human Services$2,498Education$800Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $11,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,180 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH IN MOTION USA INC: $912 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $358 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $272 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $252 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $234 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAISH HATORAH OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $208 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Intuition Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $194 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArachim America Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATAN B'SETER BAMBIINC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAS MAOS ERETZ YISROEL MEIR BAAL HANES RIZHIN BOYAN INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $34 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIKVAH USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds KOOL KIDS PASSAIC INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH IN MOTION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds West Side Hatzoloh ↗
  • Who funds Israel Magen Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY38.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gottesman Family Foundation · Bauer Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Issachar & Miriam Bistritzky Foundation · The Diamond Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lemoy Charitable Trust · Kanfei Yoneh Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abc Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abc Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Abc Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Abc Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph