Skip to content

· Private foundation

A Frank Orr Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$44kHealth$15kEducation$13kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$11kCivil Rights$11kArts & Culture$10kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$391k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL$2,500
BROWN BAG BUDDIES- FIRST CHRISTIAN$2,500
WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT$2,500
MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,500
AMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$2,500
HOPE PREGNANCY & RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC$2,500
SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR$2,500
CITY OF MT CARMEL PARKS DEPARTMENT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE PREGNANCY & RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $10k → 15%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $10k → 15%WABASH RALLY AGAINST CANCER: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $10k → 15%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $3k → 15%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $3k → 15%CITY OF MT CARMEL PARKS DEPARTMENT: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $1k → 15%MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 14%BROWN BAG BUDDIES- FIRST CHRISTIAN: $3k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $3k → 14%AMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $3k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 14%CITY OF MT CARMEL PARKS DEPARTMENT: $3k → 14%WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $3k → 14%WEST BERWICK MANAGEMENT INC: $3k → 14%BROWN BAG BUDDIES- FIRST CHRISTIAN: $3k → 14%HOPE PREGNANCY & RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $3k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $3k → 14%WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $3k → 14%HOPE PREGNANCY & RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $3k → 14%AMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $3k → 14%WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $2k → 14%WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $2k → 14%CITY OF MOUNT CARMEL: $2k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $2k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $2k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $2k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $2k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $2k → 14%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $1k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 14%HOPE PREGNANCY & RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 14%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $1k → 14%CITY OF MOUNT CARMEL: $1k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $1k → 14%WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $1k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 14%SAFE HAVEN OF MOUNT CARMEL: $1k → 14%MOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 14%WABASH RALLY AGAINST CANCER: $1k → 14%WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +233% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$122k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+233%
-8%

Still filing today

17%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k
  • WC
    WEDNESDAY'S CHILD
    6× · 2018–2023 · $12k
  • SI
    SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k

Funded once

  • WB
    West Berwick Management Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -8%
  • MC
    MOUNT CARMEL JUNIOR FOOTBALL
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INC: $36,000 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL PICKLEBALL CLUB INCWEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $12,250 · OtherWEDNESDAY'S CHILDSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR: $11,000 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS CENTER FORSAFE HAVEN OF MT CARMEL INC: $11,000 · OtherSAFE HAVEN OF MT CARMEL INCWABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICT: $10,360 · OtherWABASH COUNTY MUSEUM DISTRICTMOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $8,000 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARYAMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherCITY OF MT CARMEL PARKS DEPARTMENT: $5,000 · OtherBROWN BAG BUDDIES- FIRST CHRISTIAN: $5,000 · OtherWABASH RALLY AGAINST CANCER: $4,250 · Other+2 more: $3,500 · OtherHOPE PREGNANCY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $11,000 · HealthHOPE PREG…West Berwick Management Inc: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$111,360Health$11,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE HAVEN OF MT CARMEL INC: $11,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $11,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetWest Berwick Management Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF MT CARMEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds West Berwick Management Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A Frank Orr Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A Frank Orr Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A Frank Orr Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph