Skip to content

· Private foundation

A&E Hauer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
0151% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$149kPhilanthropy$122kHealth$31kArts & Culture$16kEducation$6kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$2kScience & Tech$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$67,748
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Misc Charity$67,748
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $391) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Achiezer: $198 → 6%Achiezer: $50 → 6%Bonei Olam: $100 → 20%A Time: $18 → 20%Misaskim: $25 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$546k · 142 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

142 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 141 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

142
270

Total granted

$546k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+33%

Still filing today

4%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $450 · revenue +115%
  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $248 · revenue +16%
  • MU
    MIKVAH USA INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $180 · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • HF
    Heritage Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • UT
    United Talmudical Academy
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • C
    CKCY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
4
Ezreinu Inc
Health
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
10
Avodat Avraham Inc
Religion
11
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
12
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chayim V Chesed; the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 412 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Misc Charity: $189,294 · OtherMisc CharityIndividual grant recipient: $53,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTov Vchesed: $30,200 · OtherCong Yetev Lev: $25,048 · OtherCONG OHEL TORAH: $23,418 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · Other+187 more: $263,010 · Other+187 moreREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $450 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $250 · HealthVYAZREIM INC: $400 · Public BenefitACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $248 · Human ServicesYETEV LEV INC: $180 · PhilanthropyMIKVAH USA INC: $180 · ReligionKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $150 · International
Other$605,006Health$700Public Benefit$400Human Services$248Philanthropy$180Religion$180International$150

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHR BACHOSHECH INC: $480 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $248 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY75.8× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · S&E Foundation · Blum Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Bochner Foundation · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · Keren Ish Foundation · Kanfei Yoneh Foundation · Nimlach Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A&E Hauer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A&E Hauer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 412 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A&E Hauer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph