Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New York · Public charity

536 Club Inc

To maintain the Knights of Columbus Hall on behalf of Loretto Council 536, a voluntary organization founded to establish a community spirit among Roman Catholic men in the Town of Philipstown and to foster religious and charitable growth and deeds.

$639k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of 536 Club Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Knights Of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2024
$630,281
Largest grant, FY2024
$630,281
States reached, FY2024
1

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2024.

Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund$630,281
Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund$8,000

Compare 536 Club Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 536 Club Inc?

Find your warmest path to 536 Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About 536 Club Inc

How much does 536 Club Inc give?
536 Club Inc reported 2 grants totaling $638,838 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does 536 Club Inc fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is 536 Club Inc based?
536 Club Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home