Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Ohio · Public charity

1792 Exchange

1792 Exchange is a 501(c)(3), non-profit organization whose mission is to develop policy and resources to protect and equip non-profits, small businesses and philanthropy from "woke" corporations, to educate Congress and stakeholder organizations about the dangers of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) policies, and to help steer…

$7k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of 1792 Exchange’s FY2023 grant dollars went to United Charitable, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$7,190
Largest grant, FY2023
$7,190
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$2.3M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Human Services$362kPhilanthropy$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Institute for Women's Health$362,000154%

Compare 1792 Exchange with peer funders

About 1792 Exchange

How much does 1792 Exchange give?
1792 Exchange reported 1 grants totaling $7,190 in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does 1792 Exchange fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2022, its largest causes are Human Services (98%), Philanthropy (2%).
Who are 1792 Exchange's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: Institute for Women's Health ($362k).
Where is 1792 Exchange based?
1792 Exchange is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 1792 Exchange’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home