Skip to content

· Private foundation

10x Better Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of 10x Better Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year 10x Better Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $6M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’23
5
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Environment$2.5MPhilanthropy$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.0MHealth$500kCrime & Legal$500k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $140k
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.5M
$1,000,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REFED INC$1,000,000
OPEN PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC (LEAF)$1,000,000
RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK$1,000,000
CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION$1,000,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$500,000
HEALTH IN HARMONY PROGRAM$500,000
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$500,000
THE TONY XU AND PATTI BAO FAMILY DONOR ADVISOR FUND$140,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%GOFUNDMEORG: $25k → 14%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $500k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $500k → 14%REFED INC: $1.0M → 14%RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK: $1.0M → 10%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $500k → 14%OPEN PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC (LEAF): $1.0M → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rare

Rare inspires change so people and nature thrive.

Environment
5
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
6
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
7
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
8
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
9
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
10
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
11
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
12
The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation

The conservation fund is in the business of conservation, creating innovative solutions that drive nature-based action for climate protection, sustainable economies and vibrant communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainforest Action Network; the most unlike its peers is Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPEN PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC (LEAF): $1,000,000 · OtherOPEN PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC …HEALTH IN HARMONY PROGRAM: $500,000 · OtherHEALTH IN HARMONY PROGRAMTHE TONY XU AND PATTI BAO FAMILY DONOR ADVISOR FUND: $140,000 · OtherTHE TONY XU AND PATTI BAO FAMIL…THE TONY XU AND PATTI BAO FAMILY FUND: $100,000 · OtherTHE TONY XU AND PATTI BAO FAMIL…Rainforest Action Network: $1,000,000 · EnvironmentRainforest Action NetworkWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentREFED INC: $1,000,000 · Food & NutritionREFED INCCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · Science & TechCLIMATEWORKS FOUND…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELL…GOFUNDMEORG: $25,000 · PhilanthropyBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $500,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CEN…
Other$1,740,000Environment$1,510,000Food & Nutrition$1,000,000Science & Tech$1,000,000Philanthropy$525,000Crime & Legal$500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREFED INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $1,000,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $500,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 10x Better Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 10x Better Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 10x Better Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 10x Better Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 10x Better’s filings →

    More from the funding graph