Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Ontario · Registered charity

WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS

WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS (Ontario) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,800 to it, the largest being DR. LEONARD REEVES FOUNDATION (C$2,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$1k
Revenue FY2023
3
Funders on record
C$5k
Grants received
C$3k
Net assets
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%

Against its field

WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS's revenue fell 97% between 2017 and 2023.

Operating margin−1792% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−43% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,080 arts nonprofits under $100k, FY2023

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$36k) Expenses 100 (C$45k) Net assets 100 (C$45k)2018 Revenue 82 (C$29k) Expenses 83 (C$38k) Net assets 82 (C$36k)2019 Revenue 90 (C$32k) Expenses 78 (C$35k) Net assets 75 (C$33k)2020 Revenue 30 (C$11k) Expenses 39 (C$17k) Net assets 71 (C$32k)2021 Expenses 4 (C$2k) Net assets 56 (C$25k)2022 Expenses 4 (C$2k) Net assets 63 (C$28k)2023 Revenue 3 (C$1k) Expenses 49 (C$22k) Net assets 6 (C$3k)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (3)Expenses (49)Net assets (6)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 4% · 2019 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (28% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 996 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$9k
’17
−C$8k
’18
−C$3k
’19
−C$7k
’20
’21
’22
−C$21k
’23
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2019: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell C$2k → C$2k.

From the CRA filings of WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS.

52%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 100% · 2019 75% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

63% of WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$800 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 101 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2019C$3k
17
19
  • 9% of FY2019 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Governance

5
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS?
WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS (Ontario) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,800 to it, the largest being DR. LEONARD REEVES FOUNDATION (C$2,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 3 organizations giving C$4,800 in grants to WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS?
DR. LEONARD REEVES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$2,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOODSTOCK FANSHAWE SINGERS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

Play a game about who funds Woodstock Fanshawe Singers →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register