Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Ontario · Registered charity

RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL

RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL (Ontario) receives grants from 139 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$17,542,333 to it, the largest being THE SLAIGHT FAMILY FOUNDATION (C$2,587,000). 89 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$59M
Revenue FY2024
139
Funders on record
C$18M
Grants received
C$16M
Net assets
89/139 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%

Against its field

RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 145 community resource nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve6.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 145 community resource nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$45M) Expenses 100 (C$45M) Net assets 100 (C$2.6M)2018 Revenue 103 (C$46M) Expenses 99 (C$45M) Net assets 158 (C$4.0M)2019 Revenue 105 (C$47M) Expenses 104 (C$47M) Net assets 161 (C$4.1M)2020 Revenue 97 (C$44M) Expenses 88 (C$40M) Net assets 336 (C$8.6M)2021 Revenue 107 (C$48M) Expenses 100 (C$45M) Net assets 439 (C$11M)2022 Revenue 128 (C$57M) Expenses 121 (C$55M) Net assets 553 (C$14M)2023 Revenue 127 (C$57M) Expenses 123 (C$55M) Net assets 622 (C$16M)2024 Revenue 131 (C$59M) Expenses 129 (C$59M) Net assets 637 (C$16M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (131)Expenses (129)Net assets (637)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 28% · 2018 23% · 2019 23% · 2020 30% · 2021 25% · 2022 27% · 2023 26% · 2024 33%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

14% of RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 123 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$294k
’17
C$1.5M
’18
C$75k
’19
C$3.8M
’20
C$2.6M
’21
C$2.9M
’22
C$1.8M
’23
C$376k
’24
6.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 63 funders to 50 funders, grant income fell C$2.3M → C$1.8M.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$1.1M
Mlse Foundationunclassified
C$1.0M
C$757k
Carthy Foundationunclassified
C$594k
Fondation Chamandyunclassified
C$420k
C$278k
C$261k
C$224k
C$135k
C$125k
M.E.H. Foundationunclassified
C$120k
C$114k
funders
63
60
69
57
54
56
50
45

From the CRA filings of RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 139 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 15% of grant income, and it takes 8 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 8 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL.

15%
largest funder
30%
top three
~19
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 23% · 2018 25% · 2019 15% · 2020 21% · 2021 12% · 2022 13% · 2023 14% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

75% of RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$423k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 139 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$19M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 33% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 3%Fundraising 4%

Governance

16
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL?
RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL (Ontario) receives grants from 139 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$17,542,333 to it, the largest being THE SLAIGHT FAMILY FOUNDATION (C$2,587,000). 89 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 139 organizations giving C$17,542,333 in grants to RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL, 89 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL?
THE SLAIGHT FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$2,587,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 139 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register