Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Chamandy

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to qualified donees as defined in the income tax act (canada)

C$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
101
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
Regions reached
C$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$45k
  • C$10k–50k41 grants · C$1.0M
  • C$50k–250k52 grants · C$3.4M
C$50,000
Median grant
6
Regions reached
C$94M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pathways to Education Canada/PasseporC$200,000
Héberjeune de Parc ExtensionC$128,865
Médecins du MondeC$103,000
White RibbonC$100,959
Fondation Marie VincentC$100,000
Canadian Alliance to End HomelessnessC$100,000
Native Women's Shelter of MontrealC$95,000
Spence Neighbourhood Association Inc.C$81,303
Projets Autochtones du QuebecC$75,075
Muscular Dystrophy CanadaC$75,000
Douglas Mental Health University InstituteC$75,000
nternational Bureau for Children's RightsC$75,000
Maison Internationale de la Rive-Sud Inc.C$72,585
The David Suzuki FoundationC$70,000
Afrique au fémininC$69,655
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$15M · 56 repeat orgsC$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
44

Total granted

C$15M
C$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    La Fondation du Grand Montreal
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$6.3M · revenue +130%
  • PT
    PATHWAYS TO EDUCATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$600k · revenue +17%
  • FM
    FONDATION MARIE-VINCENT
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$530k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIOIN OF CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$10M · revenue +125%
  • WI
    WEST ISLAND PALLIATIVE CARE RESIDENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$1.1M · revenue +32%
  • MU
    McGill University Health Centre Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$425k · revenue +175%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L'Institut international de Montréal pour l'environnement / the Montreal international institute for the environment
—
2
Le réseau québécois en innovation sociale
—
3
Mouvement Jeunesse Montréal-Nord

Services d'aide aux jeunes. ce programme a pour but de venir en aide aux jeunes en difficulté sur le plan psychosocial. pour ce faire il met à leur disposition des outils nécessaires à leur développement et les ressources soit de…

—
4
Fondation du Carrefour Jeunesse Emploi Laval

Promouvoir l'éducation en offrant des bourses et des prix à des jeunes de 15 à 35 ans dans le besoin afin d'encourager l'excellence et l'approfondissement de connaissances liées au marché du travail. promouvoir la santé en défrayant les…

—
5
La Fondation Jean Meloche /the Jean Meloche Foundation

Aide au développement de la relève de diverses disciplines et de centres d'excellence qui visent le soulagement de la souffrance ou de l'incapacité physique ou mentale.

—
6
Fondation Jeunes et Société

Supporter des organismes dans but lucratif qui soutiennent des projets et des initiatives pour les jeunes.

—
7
Dis-moi

Développement d'une plateforme numérique qui permet de promouvoir le bien-être et prévenir le suicide chez les adolescents.

—
8
Le Git'enfants

Offrir un support académique alternatif aux jeunes ayant des difficultés d'adaptation scolaire par des projets qui développent la motivation le sens de l'organisation l'estime de soi la créativité l'autonomie. établir et organiser un lieu…

—
9
ActionS pour le mieux-être de l'enfance

Soutien financier à des organismes de la grande région de Montréal qui oeuvrent auprès des enfants vivants sous le seuil de la pauvreté dans le but d'encourager la persévérance scolaire et lutter contre le décrochage en offrant un…

—
10
Autisme Montréal
—
11
Fonds de recherche Inclusion sociale (Fris)
—
12
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Ancrage Jeunesse and the most unlike its peers is Afrique au féminin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
154/154
Grantees still filing
78/154
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIOIN OF CANADA — C$10,227,463 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLa Fondation du Grand Montreal — C$6,255,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetWEST ISLAND PALLIATIVE CARE RESIDENCE — C$1,150,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPATHWAYS TO EDUCATION — C$600,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION MARIE-VINCENT — C$530,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetROYAL INSTITUTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING MCGILL UNI — C$500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMcGill University Health Centre Foundation — C$425,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRIGHT TO PLAY INTERNATIONAL — C$420,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMoisson Montreal — C$400,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTERESA DELLAR PALLIATIVE — C$300,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE CONNECTION — C$284,612 over 4y, 40% of budgetFONDATION DES LOGIS ROSE-VIRGINIE — C$280,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetThe Sunshine Foundation of Canada — C$260,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetAFRIQUE AU FÉMININ — C$231,135 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetWhite Ribbon — C$200,959 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetSt. George Orthodox Church — C$200,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetFONDATION HABILITAS — C$194,396 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNative Women's Shelter of Montreal — C$190,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMaison Internationale de la Rive-Sud Inc. — C$178,585 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHéberjeune de Parc Extension — C$176,865 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA — C$175,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL — C$175,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetECO-MARIS — C$170,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetENJEU EN ENVIORONNEMENT JEUNESSE INC. — C$167,500 over 2y, 23% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — C$159,456 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMains Utiles — C$155,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetInstitut F/F Institute — C$150,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetTHE DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION — C$150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCAMPUS DE LA TRANSACTION ECOLOGIQUE — C$130,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLA DAUPHINELLE — C$125,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetToujours Ensemble Inc. — C$120,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF WELLINGTON — C$120,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetNIIJKIWENDIDAA ANISHNAABEKWEWAG SERVICES CIRCLE — C$120,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTHE CANADIAN RED CROSS — C$111,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProjets Autochtones du Quebec — C$105,075 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMédecins du Monde — C$103,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLes Scientifines — C$101,200 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetFondation Ancrage Jeunesse — C$100,300 over 2y, 23% of budgetFONDATION JEUNES EN TETE — C$100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLE PHARE ENFANTS ET FAMILLES — C$100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUN ITINERAIRE POUR TOUS — C$100,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetPediatric Research Foundation — C$100,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSENTIER URBAIN — C$100,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFUSION JEUNESSE — C$100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCanadian Alliance to End Homelessness — C$100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFondation Tel-jeunes — C$100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetECOLE D'ART POINTE-ST-CHARLES — C$100,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetMAKEWAY CHARITABLE SOCIETY — C$93,680 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand…The Trottier Family F…Fondation Famille God…Hewitt FoundationFondation Famille Lég…Fondation J.A. DeseveFondation de la famil…Jewish Community Foun…Fondation J Armand Bo…Fondation Lucie et An…La Fondation Choquett…Fondation Lise et Ric…
La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC30.2× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Hewitt Foundation · Fondation Famille Léger · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Fondation Lucie et André Chagnon · La Fondation Choquette-Legault · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 838039667:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Chamandy’s filings →