Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Quebec · Registered charity

PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS

PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS (Quebec) receives grants from 23 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$156,605 to it, the largest being FONDATION J.A. DESEVE (C$42,605). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$1.9M
Revenue FY2024
23
Funders on record
C$157k
Grants received
C$1.0M
Net assets
10/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%

Against its field

PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 388 support of schools and education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · above the median
Months of reserve13.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 388 support of schools and education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$398k) Expenses 100 (C$391k) Net assets 100 (C$41k)2018 Revenue 3 (C$14k) Expenses 8 (C$32k) Net assets 243 (C$100k)2019 Revenue 123 (C$490k) Expenses 117 (C$457k) Net assets 364 (C$150k)2020 Revenue 172 (C$684k) Expenses 134 (C$523k) Net assets 754 (C$311k)2021 Revenue 209 (C$832k) Expenses 161 (C$628k) Net assets 1249 (C$515k)2022 Revenue 359 (C$1.4M) Expenses 320 (C$1.3M) Net assets 1693 (C$698k)2023 Revenue 427 (C$1.7M) Expenses 406 (C$1.6M) Net assets 1965 (C$810k)2024 Revenue 487 (C$1.9M) Expenses 454 (C$1.8M) Net assets 2517 (C$1.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (487)Expenses (454)Net assets (2517)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 69% · 2019 55% · 2020 68% · 2021 68% · 2022 85% · 2023 86% · 2024 88%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

25% of PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (34% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 355 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$7k
’17
−C$19k
’18
C$33k
’19
C$161k
’20
C$204k
’21
C$174k
’22
C$112k
’23
C$163k
’24
14
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 8 funders, grant income fell C$29k → C$20k.

From the CRA filings of PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 17 of 23 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 27% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS.

27%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 77% · 2019 71% · 2020 35% · 2021 44% · 2022 89% · 2023 49% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS's grant income comes from Quebec funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Quebec out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 23 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$1.7M
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 88% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Quebec

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Governance

13
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS?
PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS (Quebec) receives grants from 23 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$156,605 to it, the largest being FONDATION J.A. DESEVE (C$42,605). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 23 organizations giving C$156,605 in grants to PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS?
FONDATION J.A. DESEVE is the largest funder on record, with C$42,605 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJET DE PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES: CUMULUS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Quebec.

Play a game about who funds Projet de Prévention Des Toxicomanies: Cumulus →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register