Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Gatineau, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Robert Piché Inc.

Solliciter et recueillir des dons pour aider des personnes qui ont des problèmes de toxicomanie d'alcoolisme et de jeu compulsif.

C$178k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$15k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$113k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
L'ANTRE TEMPS LONGUEUILC$50,000
FONDATION DAVID CHIASSONC$25,000
M.H.P.D LE PASSANTC$20,000
LE GRAIN D'SEL DE LA VALLÉE DE RICHELIEUC$19,765
DESTINATION TRAVAILC$18,000
CENTRE NAHAC$10,000
L'ACCUEUIL D'AMOSC$10,000
FONDATION ANDRÉ BOUDREAUC$10,000
PROJET DE PREVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES CUMULUSC$5,000
L'EXODEC$5,000
LA GRANDE TABLEC$2,500
LA CHAUDRONNÉE DE L'ESTRIEC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$215k · 7 repeat orgsC$134k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +157% since the first grant, against +83% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

C$215k
C$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+157%
+83%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DAVID CHIASSON
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$50k · revenue +73%
  • FA
    FONDATION ANDRÉ BOUDREAU
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$30k · revenue +225%
  • ML
    M.H.P.D LE PASSANT
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$24k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • LG
    LE GRAND CHEMIN INC.graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +41%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k
  • AT
    AUX TROIS MÀTSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maison La BouÉE 2000

Aide aux personnes alcooliques toxicomanes joueurs compulsifs

—
2
Action Toxicomanie

Effectuer des interventions en prévention auprès des jeunes de 12 à 30 ans en regard de la problématique toxicomanie.

—
3
La Relance Nicolet-BÉCancour Inc.

La prévention des dépendances reliées à l'alcoolisme aux autres toxicomanies ainsi qu'au jeu pathalogique

—
4
Le Havre Du Fjord Inc.

Offrir des services spécialisés de traitement interne intensif et externe en toxicomanie & santé mentale jeu cyberdépendance et réinsertion sociale.

—
5
De Soi à l'Emploi
—
6
L'unite Toxi Des Trois-Vallees

On aide des personnes à se sortir de la dépendance à l'alcool aux drogues et à la dépendance aux jeux.

—
7
Declic Action

Aider les personnes prisent avec un problème de dépendance lié à l'alcool aux drogues et au jeu pathologique. offrir un service d'aide et de soutien à la désintoxication et de réinsertion sociale.

—
8
Centre de traitement des dépendances Le Rucher

L'organisme exploite un centre de réadaptation et de réinsertion sociale pour les toxicomanes.

—
9
La Montee Centre De Prevention Et De Traitement Des Dependances Au Bas-Saint-Laurent

Traitements avec hébergement de personnes dépendantes à l'alcool aux jeux aux drogues et aux tabacs. prévention de la toxicomaine dans les écoles et auprès de la population en générale.

—
10
La Maison Arc-En-Ciel

Aide aux jeunes toxicomanes

—
11
Groupe D'entraide a L'intention Des Personnes Seropositives Et Itinerantes

Groupe d'entraide pour les personnes séropositives itinérante et toxicoman

—
12
Centre D'intervention En Dependances Adrienne-Roy

Promouvoir la réadaptation des personnes souffrant d'alcoolisme et autres toxicomanies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nouvelle approche humanitaire d'apprentissage and the most unlike its peers is Le Grain D'sel De La VallÉE Du Richelieu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DAVID CHIASSON — C$50,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetL'ANTRE TEMPS LONGUEUIL — C$50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetM.H.P.D LE PASSANT — C$23,553 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCUMULUS PRÉVENTION DES TOXICOMANIES — C$20,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLE GRAIN D'SEL DE LA VALLÉE DE RICHELIEU — C$19,765 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDESTINATION TRAVAIL — C$18,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetL'ACCUEUIL D'AMOS — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRE NAHA — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLE GRAND CHEMIN INC. — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetL'EXODE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUX TROIS MÀTS — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLA GRANDE TABLE — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Jeanne-Esth…Fondation Laure Gaudr…Ordre de la Tres Sain…La Fondation du Grand…Fondation J.A. DesevePayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation Jeanne-EstherQC8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Jeanne-Esther · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · Ordre de la Tres Sainte-Trinite · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation J.A. Deseve · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under core health care.

Source object 834747545:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Robert Piché’s filings →