Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Alberta · Registered charity

LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68

LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 (Alberta) receives grants from 6 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$137,070 to it, the largest being LETHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$69,820). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

C$57M
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
C$137k
Grants received
C$47M
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 is better cushioned than half of the 442 teaching institutions nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 442 teaching institutions nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$52M) Expenses 100 (C$53M) Net assets 100 (C$12M)2018 Revenue 104 (C$54M) Expenses 103 (C$54M) Net assets 97 (C$12M)2019 Revenue 104 (C$54M) Expenses 102 (C$54M) Net assets 101 (C$13M)2020 Revenue 96 (C$50M) Expenses 95 (C$50M) Net assets 465 (C$58M)2021 Revenue 101 (C$53M) Expenses 99 (C$52M) Net assets 464 (C$58M)2022 Revenue 103 (C$54M) Expenses 103 (C$54M) Net assets 449 (C$56M)2023 Revenue 104 (C$54M) Expenses 106 (C$56M) Net assets 407 (C$51M)2024 Revenue 110 (C$57M) Expenses 109 (C$57M) Net assets 379 (C$47M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (110)Expenses (109)Net assets (379)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 95% · 2018 94% · 2019 93% · 2020 95% · 2021 97% · 2022 95% · 2023 94% · 2024 94%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

1% of LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (1% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 390 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$595k
’17
−C$392k
’18
C$532k
’19
−C$301k
’20
C$846k
’21
−C$308k
’22
−C$1.4M
’23
−C$188k
’24
3.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell C$32k → C$7k.

From the CRA filings of LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68.

51%
largest funder
85%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 84% · 2018 41% · 2019 62% · 2020 43% · 2021 67% · 2022 70% · 2023 72% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

51% of LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the C$67k that is directly attributable, 78% of it comes from funders outside Alberta, across 2 regions.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alberta out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$70k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$54M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 94% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alberta

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68?
LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 (Alberta) receives grants from 6 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$137,070 to it, the largest being LETHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$69,820). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 6 organizations giving C$137,070 in grants to LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68?
LETHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$69,820 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LIVINGSTONE RANGE SCHOOL DIVISION #68 find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alberta.

Play a game about who funds Livingstone Range School Division #68 →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register