JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES)

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

Government-grant reliance: 2017 56% · 2018 60% · 2019 65% · 2020 65% · 2021 66% · 2022 76% · 2023 50% · 2024 52%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 16 funders to 34 funders, grant income rose C$1.2M → C$1.7M.

From the CRA filings of JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES)’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 66 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES) leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 1 funder.

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES).

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 70% · 2018 71% · 2019 90% · 2020 72% · 2021 87% · 2022 71% · 2023 55% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

55% of JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES)'s funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES)'s grant income comes from Ontario funders.

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$106k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.