Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

North York, ON · Private foundation

Ellen and Martin Prosserman Foundation Inc /Fondation

Receipt and maintenance of a fund all part thereof and the income thereof for charitable purposes and gifts to qualified donees.

C$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$350k
  • C$250k+4 grants · C$1.8M
C$300,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDERTON FOUNDATION (DESIGNATED GIFT)C$500,000
THE GARY AND MADOKA FOUNDATION (DESIGNATED GIFT)C$500,000
RONPRO FOUNDATION (DESIGNATED GIFT)C$450,000
PROSSERMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTREC$300,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SERVICE OF GREATER TORONTOC$200,000
CONGREGATION DARCHEI NOAMC$100,000
JIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES) TORONTOC$50,000
SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION CANADAC$1,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$27M · 13 repeat orgsC$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

C$27M
C$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    TORONTO GENERAL AND WESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$8.9M · revenue +83%
  • AS
    ACORN SEED FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$5.4M · revenue +26% · 100% of their budget
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO
    5× · 2018–2023 · C$4.0M · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO
    one grant, 2021 · C$3.0M
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES
    one grant, 2022 · C$12k · revenue +22%
  • UC
    UNITY Charity
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
2
The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay from time to time qualified donees.

—
3
United Jewish Appeal of Canada Inc

Fundraising among jewish communities in canada for charitable purposes within canada. activities are carried out through grants to united israel appeal of canada inc. which is a qualified donee.

—
4
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
5
The M & J Charitable Trust

Provide donations to other qualified charities and foundations to benefit the well-being of the Jewish community

—
6
The C & K Jakubovic Family Charitable Trust

Provide donations to other qualified charities and foundations to benefit the well-being of the Jewish community

—
7
Yaldei Aharon

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to charitable organizations that are also registered charities under the income tax act (canada).

—
8
Israel Cancer Research Fund (Toronto)

The israel cancer research fund (toronto) provides funds to aid in the research of cancer in all phases: causes detection diagnosis treatment cure and care.

—
9
Jewish National Fund of Canada Inc. Fonds National Juif Du Canada Inc.

The charity exists to provide, enlarge and administer a fund made up of voluntary contributions from the jewish community of canada and others to be used for charitable purposes. there are no new programs established during the year.

—
10
Friends of Jnf

Promotion of israel's legal rights through publication and working with other registered charities and qualified donees.

—
11
M. Koplowitz Charity Fund

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).

—
12
The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba

The jewish foundation of manitoba is the jewish community's endowment fund. the foundation which is independent of other community organizations operates under the mandate to receive capital gifts to be held in perpetuity. these gifts are…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jewish Family and Child Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTORONTO GENERAL AND WESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$8,900,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetACORN SEED FOUNDATION — C$5,400,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO — C$4,000,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPROSSERMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$1,650,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTHE GARY AND MADOKE FOUNDATION ( DESIGNATED GIFT) — C$1,635,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetWILDERTON FOUNDATION (DESIGNATED GIFT) — C$1,585,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetRONPRO FOUNDATION ( DESIGNATED GIFT) — C$1,545,000 over 3y, 84% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SERVICE OF GREATER TORONTO — C$950,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCONGREGATION DARCHEI NOAM — C$500,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetJIAS (JEWISH IMMIGRANT AID SERVICES) TORONTO — C$455,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetUIA-JEWISH FEDERATION OF CANADA — C$300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD FOUNDATION — C$260,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetFRIENDS OF SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY Charity — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION CANADA — C$9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM CAMP GEORGE — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMH FOUNDATION — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Foundation of …United Jewish Appeal …Conam Charitable Foun…Charitable Gift Funds…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Jewish Foundation of Greater TorontoON9.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · Conam Charitable Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 892900788:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ellen and Martin Prosserman Foundation Inc /Fondation’s filings →