Ontario · Registered charity
GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT
GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT (Ontario) receives grants from 22 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$227,586 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$136,024). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT's funding base is broadening — from 7 funders to 10 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,360 organizations relieving poverty nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Manitoba Council for International Co-Operation Inc.shared fundersportfolio match
- Perth Community Churchlocal
- Health Partners International of Canada / Partenaires canadiens pour la santé internationaleportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
96% of GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose C$13k → C$33k.
From the CRA filings of GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 20 of 22 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 37% · 2019 59% · 2020 70% · 2021 48% · 2022 48% · 2023 56% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
42% of GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
94% of GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT's grant income comes from Ontario funders.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$8k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 22 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Manitoba Council for International Co-Operation Inc.shared fundersportfolio matchMB · backs 22 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Perth Community ChurchlocalON · funds 3 organizations near you
- Health Partners International of Canada / Partenaires canadiens pour la santé internationaleportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario Humanity Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Diocesan Commission on Missions Diocese of Londonportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ross Ulmer Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Admaston Pastoral Chargeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Peterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Campbell Webster Foundation Inc.portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Dave and Ann Trick Family FoundationlocalON · funds 4 organizations near you
- United Way of Lanark CountylocalON · funds 2 organizations near you
- The Russ Beach Smiths Falls-Montague Airport Aviation Historical Museum SocietylocalON · funds 2 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Ontario
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
94% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Questions and answers
- Who funds GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT?
- GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT (Ontario) receives grants from 22 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$227,586 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$136,024). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 22 organizations giving C$227,586 in grants to GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT?
- CANADAHELPS CANADON is the largest funder on record, with C$136,024 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.
Play a game about who funds Guatemala Stove Project →
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register