Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Ottawa, ON · Public foundation

Trinity Jubilee Foundation Inc.

Tembo malawi water project

C$16k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
2
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMBOC$8,000
GUATEMALAC$3,500
THE WOMENS CENTRE GREY BRUCEC$2,000
THE YELLOW DOORC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$38k · 3 repeat orgsC$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

C$38k
C$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEMBO - TANZARIA EDUCATION & MICRO-BUSINESS OPP
    2× · 2020–2022 · C$21k · revenue +28%
  • E
    ECO-EQUITABLE
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$9k · revenue -15%
  • GS
    GUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$8k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • EI
    EMBRACE INTERNATIONAL FREEDOMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +65%
  • HL
    HEALTHY LIVES INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · C$4k · revenue +17%
  • SF
    SIMBI FOUNDATION - THE WALKING SCHOOL BUS
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k · revenue -89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water School

Through implementing partners the water school runs programs focusing on health sanitation and clean water in various districts throughout uganda. also the water school provide programs in uganda to reduce teenage pregnancy including…

—
2
H2O4ALL

To improve the quality of drinking water in underdeveloped and developing countries by constructing clean water systems and water purification irrigation and sewages/sanitation treatment systems.

—
3
Help 2 Overcome Society

H2O works together with schools in the developing world helping them to set up and manage practical and sustainable sanitation and hygiene facilities. We work with individual schools together with teachers community leaders and government…

—
4
Forafrika

Forafrika's work is carried out through our six core programming pillars: humanitarian emergency response; access to safe drinking water sanitation and hygiene (wash); supporting quality education; enhancing health and nutrition; boosting…

—
5
Raising the Village Inc.

Bringing sustainable solution programs to rural communities in Uganda Rwanda and the DRC. We design sustainable solution-based projects to address a village's most significant challenges in the areas of healthcare water and sanitation…

—
6
The Hope Project Society

Education in developing nations providing workshops seminars and training classes. installation of water filtration systems in remote communities in need.

—
7
Pendo International Projects

Quality education program zero hunger program clean water and sanitation program. school transportation services program

—
8
Femme International

The principal activity of the organization is to promote women?s health through education in developing countries, currently in east africa. femme focuses on removing the health barriers that prevent girls from attending school on a…

—
9
Kinvest Impact Foundation

Installation of utility hubs in rural villages in Rwanda. Utilities included clean water access points and electricity generated by solar panel systems. Electricity is made available to community households and at the utility hubs for…

—
10
The Equality Effect

The Equality Effect uses human rights law to achieve concrete change in the lives of women and girls in Ghana Kenya and Malawi - change that will improve the health safety and standard of living of women and girls. 16 Girls: the '160…

—
11
Girls of Tomorrow (Got) Foundation

Promoting the empowerment of girls/women in Uganda through the following programs: Permaculture Program Scholarship Program Solar Program Menstrual Hygiene Program & Combating Menstrual Stigma Project Entrepreneurship Program For more…

—
12
Cameras for Girls

Cameras For Girls pursues Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality in Africa using photography as our catalyst. We provide women who face gender-based barriers to employment with a camera to keep and a 4-phase photography storytelling and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Watercan/Eau Vive Corporation - La Corporation Watercan/Eau Vive and the most unlike its peers is La Porte Jaune the Yellow Door. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEMBO - TANZARIA EDUCATION & MICRO-BUSINESS OPP — C$21,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetECO-EQUITABLE — C$9,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGUATEMALA STOVE PROJECT — C$7,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetEMBRACE INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHEALTHY LIVES INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY — C$4,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSIMBI FOUNDATION - THE WALKING SCHOOL BUS — C$4,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetONEPROSPER INTERNATIONAL — C$4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWATERCAN/EAUVIVE CANADA CORPORATION — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CARE INTERNATIONAL — C$4,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHUMANITY & INCLUSION - HANDICAPP INTERNATIONAL — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICA COMMUNITY TECHNICAL SERVICES SOC. — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMIKUNDURI — C$2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE WOMENS CENTRE GREY BRUCE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YELLOW DOOR — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIGHT4FREEDOM — C$1,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Unifor Social Justice…Elementary Teachers' …F. K. Morrow Foundati…United Way East Ontar…Vancity Community Fou…Abundance CanadaToronto FoundationBenefAction FoundationStrategic Charitable …Charitable Gift Funds…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…
Unifor Social Justice Fund / le Fonds de Justice Sociale D'UniforON9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Unifor Social Justice Fund / le Fonds de Justice Sociale D'Unifor · Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario Humanity Fund · F. K. Morrow Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Vancity Community Foundation · Abundance Canada · Toronto Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 864714597:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Trinity Jubilee’s filings →