Skip to content
← Canadian charities

British Columbia · Registered charity

GRACE NATIVE MISSION

GRACE NATIVE MISSION (British Columbia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$281,347 to it, the largest being GRACE HANIN COMMUNITY CHURCH (C$182,797). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$98k
Revenue FY2024
11
Funders on record
C$281k
Grants received
C$125k
Net assets
8/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 48%

Against its field

GRACE NATIVE MISSION has grown faster than half of the 10,968 christianity nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−9% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,968 christianity nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$82k) Expenses 100 (C$82k) Net assets 100 (C$86k)2018 Revenue 131 (C$107k) Expenses 91 (C$75k) Net assets 128 (C$111k)2019 Revenue 115 (C$94k) Expenses 112 (C$92k) Net assets 107 (C$93k)2020 Revenue 127 (C$104k) Expenses 118 (C$97k) Net assets 126 (C$109k)2021 Revenue 194 (C$159k) Expenses 149 (C$122k) Net assets 164 (C$142k)2022 Expenses 170 (C$139k) Net assets 177 (C$153k)2023 Revenue 138 (C$113k) Expenses 154 (C$126k) Net assets 159 (C$137k)2024 Revenue 120 (C$98k) Expenses 130 (C$107k) Net assets 145 (C$125k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (120)Expenses (130)Net assets (145)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of GRACE NATIVE MISSION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,757 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

C$0
’17
C$32k
’18
C$3k
’19
C$7k
’20
C$37k
’21
’22
−C$13k
’23
−C$8k
’24
4.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell C$40k → C$36k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$28k
C$14k
C$5k
Mosaic Missionunclassified
C$3k
Graceway Churchunclassified
C$2k
C$800
funders
2
1
3
7
8
3
3
4

From the CRA filings of GRACE NATIVE MISSION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GRACE NATIVE MISSION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GRACE NATIVE MISSION.

65%
largest funder
88%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 100% · 2019 85% · 2020 75% · 2021 66% · 2022 91% · 2023 78% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

57% of GRACE NATIVE MISSION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 73% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of GRACE NATIVE MISSION's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 11 funders put you typical among the 74 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like GRACE NATIVE MISSION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 13%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds GRACE NATIVE MISSION?
GRACE NATIVE MISSION (British Columbia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$281,347 to it, the largest being GRACE HANIN COMMUNITY CHURCH (C$182,797). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GRACE NATIVE MISSION have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 11 organizations giving C$281,347 in grants to GRACE NATIVE MISSION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GRACE NATIVE MISSION?
GRACE HANIN COMMUNITY CHURCH is the largest funder on record, with C$182,797 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GRACE NATIVE MISSION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

Play a game about who funds Grace Native Mission →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register